Research Ethics Monthly
ISSN 2206-2483
Should we Reframe Research Ethics as a Professional Ethics?
October 1, 2019
No Comments
Dr Nathan Emmerich Research Fellow in Bioethics at ANUMS Despite the fact that one of the urtexts of bioethics—Beauchamp and
Sage Methods Minute. January Spotlight: Research Ethics
February 26, 2019
No Comments
January’s Methods Minutes, a monthly newsletter produced by Sage Publishing, is a special issue focused on social research ethics. It reviews
AHRECS Human research ethics workshop in Thailand
December 22, 2018
No Comments
One of our consultants (Dr Lindsey Te Ata o Tu MacDonald) recently facilitated a seminar on research ethics in the
Stop centring Western academic ethics: deidentification in social science research – Anna Denejkina
May 24, 2018
No Comments
This blog will provide a discussion of issues present in deidentifying marginalised research participants, or research participants who request to
‘Don’t mention the c word: Covert research and the stifling ethics regime in the social sciences’
February 5, 2018
No Comments
Covert research is associated with deliberate deception in social research and equated with harm and risk to the researcher, the
A Model for the Participation of Indigenous Children and Young People in Research
October 20, 2017
No Comments
Following my September 2017 piece: Ethics and the Participation of Indigenous Children and Young People in Research, this article briefly
Ethics and the Participation of Indigenous Children and Young People in Research
September 21, 2017
No Comments
Indigenous children and young people’s participation in social research raises a range of ethical issues that researchers and participants must
Building beneficial relationships when conducting research with migrant communities
July 25, 2017
No Comments
In my experience, projects that involve working with migrant groups and communities reveal a range of complex issues with regards
Categories
Featured posts
Hong Kong Principles
September 29, 2020
No Comments
The publication of the Hong Kong Principles comes at a time when there has never been more scrutiny of research. In this pandemic, the importance of science has been reinforced time and time again, but the importance of efforts to enhance reproducibility and transparency in research has also come to the fore. What the Hong Kong Principles do is provide a framework whereby research practices that strengthen integrity in research – a core component of reproducibility and trustworthiness – can be recognised, supported and rewarded.
Griffith University’s implementation of the Australian Code (2018)
November 25, 2018
No Comments
Dr Amanda Fernie, Manager Research Ethics & Integrity, Griffith University Dr Gary Allen, Senior
Cracking the Code: Is the Revised Australian Code likely to ensure Responsible Conduct of Research?
May 21, 2017
No Comments
The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research is presently under review. Issued
Going video: A chance to change review practice?
November 10, 2020
No Comments
In this post, Gary asks when it comes to research ethics review, whether something useful might come from social distancing