Research Ethics Monthly
ISSN 2206-2483
What are questionable research practices as reported by ECRs in STEMM in Australia?
July 29, 2020
No Comments
Katherine Christian, Carolyn Johnstone, Jo-ann Larkins, Wendy Wright and Michael Doran Katherine Christian, Federation University Australia Carolyn Johnstone, Federation University
The ethical petri-dish: recommendations for the design of university science curricula
June 18, 2020
No Comments
Dr Jo-Anne Kelder, Senior Lecturer, Curriculum Innovation and Development, University of Tasmania, https://www.linkedin.com/in/jokelder/ Professor Sue Jones, Honorary Researcher, School of
The F-word, or how to fight fires in the research literature
July 17, 2019
No Comments
Professor Jennifer Byrne | University of Sydney Medical School and Children’s Hospital at Westmead At home, I am constantly
“Reminder about service options and an easy way to pay AHRECS,” we say… aware of how corporate sleazy that sounds
June 13, 2019
No Comments
Dr Gary Allen, Senior Consultants AHRECS Prof. Mark Israel Prof. Colin Thomson AM . Just in time for the end of the
Complainant anonymity in misconduct proceedings depends on the forum
May 23, 2019
No Comments
Prof. Colin Thomson AM, Senior Consultant, AHRECS This news item, while identifying the fact that the decision relates to court proceedings
New research integrity professional development resource
January 9, 2019
No Comments
All Australian research institutions that receive NHMRC or ARC research funding or otherwise operate under the auspices of Universities Australia
Griffith University’s implementation of the Australian Code (2018)
November 25, 2018
No Comments
Dr Amanda Fernie, Manager Research Ethics & Integrity, Griffith University Dr Gary Allen, Senior Policy Officer, Griffith University AUSTRALIAN CODE
Vigilance versus vigilantism in science: Are ethics no longer important?
June 21, 2018
25 Comments
Michael James PhD, Senior Researcher, Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital Les Cleland AM MBBS MD FRACP, Head of Rheumatology (1982-2015),
Categories
Featured posts
The inclusion of retracted trials in systematic reviews: implications for patients’ safety
May 26, 2018
1 Comment
After a paper has been through peer review and has been published it is
Should we accept funding for facial recognition research, and other dilemmas?
January 26, 2021
No Comments
Gary Allen, Mark Israel and Colin Thomson|
PEER REVIEWED
In the 1980s and 1990s, many research institutions made the principled and commendable decision not to accept funding from the tobacco industry.
This reflected the recognition of the awful health impacts of tobacco use and the degree to which the industry was muddying the waters of public debate with academic and clinical research questioning the veracity of the overwhelming body of evidence that clearly showed the dire dangers of activity such as smoking. While we continue to be shocked by cases such those like the research of Hans J Eysenck (and this), for the main it is accepted that receiving funding from the tobacco industry is not in the public’s best interest.
Should we Reframe Research Ethics as a Professional Ethics?
October 1, 2019
No Comments
Dr Nathan Emmerich Research Fellow in Bioethics at ANUMS Despite the fact that one
Inclusion of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse populations in Clinical Trials:
December 4, 2019
No Comments
Nik Zeps AHRECS Consultant Clinical trials have enormous value to society as they provide