Research Ethics Monthly
ISSN 2206-2483
Hong Kong Principles
September 29, 2020
No Comments
The publication of the Hong Kong Principles comes at a time when there has never been more scrutiny of research. In this pandemic, the importance of science has been reinforced time and time again, but the importance of efforts to enhance reproducibility and transparency in research has also come to the fore. What the Hong Kong Principles do is provide a framework whereby research practices that strengthen integrity in research – a core component of reproducibility and trustworthiness – can be recognised, supported and rewarded.
What are questionable research practices as reported by ECRs in STEMM in Australia?
July 29, 2020
No Comments
Katherine Christian, Carolyn Johnstone, Jo-ann Larkins, Wendy Wright and Michael Doran Katherine Christian, Federation University Australia Carolyn Johnstone, Federation University
The ethical petri-dish: recommendations for the design of university science curricula
June 18, 2020
No Comments
Dr Jo-Anne Kelder, Senior Lecturer, Curriculum Innovation and Development, University of Tasmania, https://www.linkedin.com/in/jokelder/ Professor Sue Jones, Honorary Researcher, School of
AHRECS and COVID-19
April 21, 2020
No Comments
To date, we are delighted to report the extended team is virus-free. Our best wishes go out to any member
Lost time may never be found again but is it time to talk about the duration of ethics approvals?
March 2, 2020
No Comments
“To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose” a time to report on ethical conduct, a
The F-word, or how to fight fires in the research literature
July 17, 2019
No Comments
Professor Jennifer Byrne | University of Sydney Medical School and Children’s Hospital at Westmead At home, I am constantly
We respect you… we just don’t need to hear from you any more: Should the consumer and their community participate in research as partners instead of just being subjects?
June 21, 2019
1 Comment
By Dr Gary Allen| Senior Policy Officer, Office for Research Griffith University | Ambassador Council the Hopkins Centre| Ambassador MS
Update on the new subscribers’ area
June 18, 2019
No Comments
We are currently expecting the new service to go live prior to us sending the July 2019 edition of the Research Ethics
Categories
Featured posts
A rose by any other name….?
November 30, 2020
No Comments
As both a researcher and a research administrator in healthcare, one of the more vexing issues that I have to deal with on an almost daily basis is how to manage what are termed quality assurance, quality improvement and audit activities. In its 2014 publication entitled “Ethical Considerations in Quality Assurance and Evaluation Activities”, the NHMRC (NHMRC QA guidance) suggests that these can be loosely gathered together under an umbrella term of Quality Assurance (QA) and/or evaluation. I believe this construct is wrong and reinforces a longstanding approach to ethics review that relies on the category of an investigative activity to determine the level of review that is used. This approach is problematic and leads to some significant unintended consequences.
If you build it, they will come- 2020 Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) Training Conference (online) 18-20 Nov
November 29, 2020
No Comments
Approximately 2.5 months from inception to execution, a veritable cornucopia of Australia’s thought leaders
Going video: A chance to change review practice?
November 10, 2020
No Comments
In this post, Gary asks when it comes to research ethics review, whether something useful might come from social distancing
A new approach to the AHRECS site
October 26, 2020
No Comments
In response to community feedback, from 1 November 2020, only papers, books and genuine resources will be posted to the AHRECS Resource Library; news and announcements will be posted to the feeds page. Searches of the site can include searches of the feed. Links to Research Ethics Monthly editions will also be posted to the feeds page. Please bear with us as we move all existing news items over to the feed. Eventually, this approach will make it easier to distinguish between research outputs and news items about human research ethics and research integrity.