Research Ethics Monthly
ISSN 2206-2483
Question for Research Ethics Monthly readers: Win for your institution a new 12-month subscription to https://www.ahrecs.vip
December 23, 2019
No Comments
Prof. Mark Israel and Dr Gary Allen We would like to encourage institutions to try out the ahrecs.vip set of
Categories
Featured posts
Our work around the world
October 22, 2020
No Comments
Close to the bottom of our revamped home page is a world map that tags the places we have been commissioned to conduct Human Research Ethics or Research Integrity work or where we have conducted philanthropic/academic/volunteer/unpaid work. Want to explore if we can do some work for you? Terrific! Drop us a line to enquiry@ahrecs.com so we can discuss your ideas.
Building beneficial relationships when conducting research with migrant communities
July 25, 2017
No Comments
In my experience, projects that involve working with migrant groups and communities reveal a
The challenge of being ‘fit for purpose’
April 10, 2022
No Comments
In this incredibly interesting post, Racheal Laugery reflects on an incredibly uncomfortable but very timely question.
Is the current approach to research ethics review fit for purpose?
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, border closes and reduced international student income, insufficient government funding and a drive towards commercial research/commercialisation is our current approach to research ethics review Imbil and responsive enough?
What needs to be challenged and
changed? How can we get there? Who will need professional development and capacity building?
This requires an approach to reform that is focused on research ethics reviewers, researchers and research office staff.
Change won’t be quick and easy, but is absolutely necessary to ensure an institution’s arrangements are fit for the time.
Our approach will need to be interactive and responsive to problems that we can’t foresee yet.
What’s at risk? Who’s responsible? Moving beyond the physical, the immediate, the proximate, and the individual
February 1, 2018
No Comments
Building the Conversation This month’s addition to the Building the Conversation series reflects upon