Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
What was that say
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

We must improve conditions and options for Australian ECRs (Papers: Katherine Christian, et. al. | June 2023)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on June 23, 2023
Keywords: Australia, Good practice, Institutional responsibilities, Supervision

The Linked Original Item was Posted On June, 5 2023 23:03:10

Artistically stressed Australian flag

Early-career researchers in Australia report dissatisfaction, bullying and questionable research practices. We discuss how this may contribute to the replication crisis and suggest local and international strategies to improve the industry.

Australian early-career researchers (ECRs) are struggling. Internationally, there have been concerning reports from researchers in the science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine (STEMM) disciplines regarding poor job security and career prospects, as well as discontentment with the general work environment.

The Australian ECR experience

The situation being endured by early career researchers in Australia is grim, unrelenting and punishing. It is burning out promising young researchers, it is causing mental anguish and causing unnecessary harm. The hard truth is, sometimes it can even end in suicide. Institutions and the supervisors of early career researchers have direct responsibility for the researchers n their charge.  Something has to change and soon!  This open access paper, published in June 2023 takes a look at the issues.

Regrettably, there are numerous problems with the Australian ECR workplace and the academic research industry. To better understand the workplace for Australian STEMM ECRs (defined here as those up to 10 years postdoctoral), we conducted surveys that included questions related to job satisfaction, workplace pressures, bullying and questionable research practices. Our surveys received 658 responses in 2019 (ref. 1) and 530 responses in 2022 (non-peer-reviewed preprint2).

ECRs almost unanimously indicated a “love of research”. However, many are struggling and most intend to leave academia (Fig. 1a). ECRs reported frequent bullying and questionable research practices, and the majority agree with the statement that “this is a poor time for a young person to start in this career” (Fig. 1a,b). Inadequate job security, a lack of funding or a lack of independent positions are some of the reasons that ECRs felt motivated to leave academia in 2019. In 2022, personal wellbeing was also a major concern and over half of respondents indicated that they were considering leaving because of depression, anxiety or other mental health concerns related to their work.

Christian, K., Larkins, Ja. & Doran, M.R. (2023) We must improve conditions and options for Australian ECRs. Nat Hum Behav (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01621-w
Publisher (Open Access): https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01621-w

Nature logo
We must improve conditions and options for Australian ECRs - Nature Human Behaviour
Early-career researchers in Australia report dissatisfaction, bullying and questionable research practices. We discuss how this may contribute to the replication crisis and suggest local and international strategies to improve the industry.

Related Reading

Suffering in Silence – Science (Simon Prades | March 2023)

Young physicists say ethics rules are being ignored – Nature (Miryam Naddaf | January 2023)

How to protect research ideas as a junior scientist – Nature (Ijeoma Opara | November 2022)

(Australia) Australia needs an Office for Research Integrity to catch up with the rest of the world – The Conversation (David Vaux | February 2022)

Ten Simple Rules for Building and Maintaining a Scientific Reputation (PLoS Papers: Philip E. Bourne & Virginia Barbour | June 2011)

Don’t make early career researchers ‘ghost authors.’ Give us the credit we deserve – Science (Karishma Bisht | September 2021)

(US) A secure procedure for early career scientists to report apparent misconduct (Papers: Baruch Fischhoff | January 2021)

(Australia) Survey of Australian STEMM Early Career Researchers: job insecurity and questionable research practices are major structural concerns (Preprint Papers: Katherine Christian, et al | February 2020)

A message for mentors from dissatisfied graduate students – Nature (Chris Woolston | November 2019)

Opinion: Exorcising Ghostwriting from Peer Review – TheScientist (James L. Sherley | January 2020)

Are we missing the true picture? Stop calling a moneybox, a fishing hook

In a world of hijacked, clone and zombie publishing, where shouldn’t I publish?

Credit where it’s due – Campus Review (Brian Martin 1997)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in