Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Using AI to write scholarly publications (Papers: Mohammad Hosseini et. al. | January 2023)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on February 9, 2023
Keywords: Authorship, Journal, Research integrity, Research Misconduct, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On January, 25 2023

Businessman on blurred background using digital artificial intelligence interface 3D rendering

Artificial intelligence (AI) natural language processing (NLP) systems, such as OpenAI’s generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) model (https://openai.com) or Meta’s Galactica (https://galactica.org/) may soon be widely used in many forms of writing, including scientific and scholarly publications (Heaven 2022).1 While computer programs (such as Microsoft WORD and Grammarly) have incorporated automated text-editing features (such as checking for spelling and grammar) for many years, these programs are not designed to create content. However, new and emerging NLP systems are, which raises important issues for research ethics and research integrity.2

A researcher using Artificial intelligence (AI) or a natural language processing (NLP) system to produce a research output, and then claiming that they wrote it  is a troubling and insidious form of research misconduct.  Even worse, it can be difficult to detect.  Institutions, publishers, learned societies and research funding bodies have a key role in the development of policies, guidance material and professional development material.  This open access editorial introduces the issues and what is at stake.  AHRECS has published a foundation that could be used for institutional guidance materials.  It is available to our patrons on https://www.ahrecs.vip.  It is Creative Commons 3.0, enabling our subscribers to use it to create their own documents, attributing AHRECS as the original source of the material.

NLP is a way of enabling computers to interact with human language. A key step in NLP, known as tokenization, involves converting unstructured text into structured text suitable for computation. For example, the sentence “The cat sat on the mat” can be structured by tagging its parts: “the [article] cat [noun] sat [verb, past tense] on [preposition] the [article] mat [noun].” Once the parts of the text have been tagged, they can be processed by means of algorithms designed to produce appropriate responses to text (i.e., language generation). Rudimentary NLP-systems, such as the first generation of chatbots that assisted customers on websites, operated according to thousands of human-written rules for processing and generating text.

Recent advances in computational speed and capacity and the development of machine-learning (ML) algorithms, such as neural networks, have led to tremendous breakthroughs in NLP (Mitchell 2020). Today’s NLP systems use ML to produce and refine statistical models (with billions of parameters) for processing and generating natural language. NLP systems are trained on huge databases (45 terabytes or more) of text available on the internet or other sources. Initial training (or supervised learning) involves giving the system the text and then “rewarding” it for giving correct outputs, as determined by human trainers.3 Over time, NLP systems will reduce their percentage of erroneous outputs and will learn from the data (Mitchell 2020). While NLP systems continue to learn as they receive and process data beyond their initial training data, they do not “know” the meaning or truth-value of the text they receive, process, and generate. Their function is simply to generate understandable (i.e., grammatically correct) and appropriate (i.e., highly probable) text outputs in response to text inputs.

Hosseini, M., Rasmussen, LM. & Resnik, DB. (2023) Using AI to write scholarly publications. Accountability in Research, DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535
Publisher (Open Access): https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535

Using AI to write scholarly publications
Published in Accountability in Research: Ethics, Integrity and Policy (Ahead of Print, 2023)

Related Reading

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature (January 2023)

ChatGPT: our study shows AI can produce academic papers good enough for journals – just as some ban it – The Conversation (Brian Lucy & Michael Dowling | January 2023)

Science journals ban listing of ChatGPT as co-author on papers – The Guardian (Ian Sample | January 2023)

CNET’s AI Journalist Appears to Have Committed Extensive Plagiarism – Futurism (Jon Christian | January 2023)

Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists – Nature (Holly Else | January 2023)

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature (Chris Stokel-Walker | January 2023)

AI and Scholarly Publishing: A View from Three Experts – The Scholarly Kitchen (Anita De Waard | January 2023)

Scientists, please don’t let your chatbots grow up to be co-authors – Substack (Gary Marcus | January 2023)

Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers (Papers: Catherine A. Gao et. al. | December 2022)

AI et al.: Machines Are About to Change Scientific Publishing Forever – ACS Publications (Gianluca Grimaldi & Bruno Ehrler | January 2023)

AI paper mills and image generation require a co-ordinated response from academic publishers – LSE (Rebecca Lawrence & Sabina Alam | December 2022)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in