Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(US) The lab management practices of “Research Exemplars” that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators (Papers: Alison L. Antes, et al | April 2019)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on September 12, 2021
Keywords: Collaborative research, Good practice, International, Research integrity

The Linked Original Item was Posted On April, 24 2019

Beautifully waving star and striped American flag

Abstract
Introduction
Conducting rigorous scientific inquiry within the bounds of research regulation and acceptable practice requires a principal investigator to lead and manage research processes and personnel. This study explores the practices used by investigators nominated as exemplars of research excellence and integrity to produce rigorous, reproducible research and comply with research regulations.

This open access paper that appeared in PLoS ONE reflects on good collaborative research practices, professional development, research leadership and research culture in exemplar labs in the US.  Even though it was published in April 2019, we suggest it provides a useful reference for thinking about lab-based teams.  Useful reading for medium to senior career stage researchers and for institutions looking to model positive research culture.

Methods
Using a qualitative research design, we interviewed 52 principal investigators working in the United States at top research universities and the National Institutes of Health Intramural Research Program. We solicited nominations of researchers meeting two criteria: (1) they are federally-funded researchers doing high-quality, high-impact research, and (2) have reputations for professionalism and integrity. Each investigator received an initial nomination addressing both criteria and at least one additional endorsement corroborating criteria 2. A panel of researchers and our research team reviewed the nominations to select finalists who were invited to participate. The cohort of “Research Exemplars” includes highly accomplished researchers in diverse scientific disciplines. The semi-structured interview questions asked them to describe the routine practices they employ to foster rigor and regulatory compliance. We used inductive thematic analysis to identify common practices.

Results
The exemplars identified a core set of 8 practices and provided strategies for employing them. The practices included holding regular team meetings, encouraging shared ownership, providing supervision, ensuring adequate training, fostering positive attitudes about compliance, scrutinizing data and findings, and following standard operating procedures. Above all, the use of these practices aim to create a psychologically safe work environment in which lab members openly collaborate to scrutinize their work and share in accountability for rigorous, compliant research.

Conclusions
Researchers typically receive limited systematic training in how to lead and manage their research teams. Training and education for principal investigators should include essential leadership and management practices and strategies that support doing high-quality research with integrity.

Antes AL, Kuykendall A, DuBois JM (2019) The lab management practices of “Research Exemplars” that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0214595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214595
Publisher (Open Access): https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0214595

The lab management practices of “Research Exemplars” that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators
Introduction Conducting rigorous scientific inquiry within the bounds of research regulation and acceptable practice requires a principal investigator to lead and manage research processes and personnel. This study explores the practices used by investigators nominated as exemplars of research excel…

Related Reading

(Australia) Research Integrity – Needs and provision of training in Australian Institutions (Resources: Australian Academy of Sciences: June 2022)

(Europe) What’s integrity got to do with it? Second-year experiences of the Path2Integrity e-learning programme (Papers: ors: Noémie Hermeking and Julia Priess-Buchheit | January 2022)

A phenomenographic study of scientists’ beliefs about the causes of scientists’ research misconduct (Papers:  Aidan C Cairns, et al | sSeptember 2021)

Effective Strategies for Research Integrity Training—a Meta-analysis (Papers: Johannes Katsarov, et al | August 2021)

(US) Leading the charge to address research misconduct – American Psychological Association (Stephanie Pappas | September 2021)

‘We’re problem solvers’: research administrators offer guidance to working scientists – Nature (Sara Reardon | July 2021)

Let’s Talk About the Volunteers in Scholarly Publishing – Scholarly Kitchen (Haseeb Irfanullah | July 2021)

(Netherlands) Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions – Nature (Chris Woolston | June 2021)

(Switzerland, UK) A new code is no weapon against excessive self-citation – Times Higher Education (Ron Iphofen | June 2021)

(EU) Governance of research integrity: Options for a coordinated approach in Europe – EMBO (Sandra Bendiscioli Michele S. Garfinkel | June 2020)

A message for mentors from dissatisfied graduate students – Nature (Chris Woolston | November 2019)

Is research integrity training a waste of time? – Nature (Gemma Conroy | February 2020)

When it comes to good practice in science, we need to think global but act local – Nature (Editorial | December 2019)

Working with research integrity – guidance for research performing organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement (Resource | February 2018)

A consensus-based transparency checklist (Papers: Balazs Aczel, et al | December 2019)

We’re Incentivizing Bad Science – Scientific American (James Zimring | October 2019)

Advancing research integrity: a programme to embed good practice in Africa (Papers: Anke Rohwer, et al | 2019)

Data sharing and how it can benefit your scientific career – Nature (Gabriel Popkin | May 2019)

To move research from quantity to quality, go beyond good intentions – Nature ( Alan Finkel | February 2019)

Fraud Ain’t The Game

Guest Post: Encouraging Data Sharing: A Small Investment for Large Potential Gain – Scholarly Kitchen (Rebecca Grant, et al | January 2019)

Nine pitfalls of research misconduct – Science (Aaron D. Robinson | May 2018)

Science isn’t broken, but we can do better: here’s how – The Conversation (Alan Finkel | April 2018)

Metrics, recognition, and rewards: it’s time to incentivise the behaviours that are good for research and researchers – LSE Impact Blog (Rebecca Lawrence | November 2017)

NSF reiterates policy on teaching good research habits despite its limitations – Science (Jeffrey Mervis | August 2017)

“Failure is an essential part of science:” A Q&A with the author of a new book on reproducibility – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | April 2017)

Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (Papers: Marc A. Edwards and Siddhartha Roy | 2017)

Approving or Improving Research Ethics in Management Journals (Papers: Michelle Greenwood 2015)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in