Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(US) Systemic Obstacles to Addressing Research Misconduct in Higher Education: A Case Study (Papers: James Golden, et al | August 2021)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on October 2, 2021
Keywords: Institutional responsibilities, International, Research integrity, Research Misconduct

The Linked Original Item was Posted On August, 29 2021

Artistically worn US flag

An interesting open access paper from the US, published in August 2021, reflecting on structural impediments to addressing research misconduct in higher education.  These are factors that will ring true in other jurisdictions.  We need to do better at supporting the responsible conduct of research and research culture in our institutions.

Abstract
Several widely publicized incidents of academic research misconduct, combined with the politicization of the role of science in public health and policy discourse (e.g., COVID, immunizations) threaten to undermine faith in the integrity of empirical research. Researchers often maintain that peer-review and study replication allow the field to self-police and self-correct; however, stark disparities between official reports of academic research misconduct and self-reports of academic researchers, specifically with regard to data fabrication, belie this argument. Further, systemic imperatives in academic settings often incentivize institutional responses that focus on minimizing reputational harm rather than the impact of fabricated data on the integrity of extant and future research.

Golden, J., Mazzotta, C.M. & Zittel-Barr, K. (2021) Systemic Obstacles to Addressing Research Misconduct in Higher Education: A Case Study. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09438-w
Publisher (Open Access): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-021-09438-w

Systemic Obstacles to Addressing Research Misconduct in Higher Education: A Case Study - Journal of Academic Ethics
Several widely publicized incidents of academic research misconduct, combined with the politicization of the role of science in public health and policy discourse (e.g., COVID, immunizations) threaten to undermine faith in the integrity of empirical research. Researchers often maintain that peer-rev…

Related Reading

“Fabulous document”, “very helpful guidance”: Sleuths react to recommendations for handling image integrity issues – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | September 2021)

(EU) How can institutions and funders help to police questionable research practices? – Nature Index (Dalmeet Singh Chawla | September 2021)

(US) Leading the charge to address research misconduct – American Psychological Association (Stephanie Pappas | September 2021)

A powerful blow against misconduct – Chemistry World (Derek Lowe – Opinion | April 2021)

(US) A secure procedure for early career scientists to report apparent misconduct (Papers: Baruch Fischhoff | January 2021)

(EU) Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe (Papers: Shila Abdi, et al | January 2021)

It’s a slippery slope to research misconduct – A Research Integrity resource

‘Each scientist must stand up, at all costs, for the truth’ – Times Higher Education (David A. Sanders | July 2020)

It’s Time to Get Serious About Research Fraud – UnDark (Dalmeet Singh Chawla | July 2020)

Research ethics courses as a vaccination against a toxic research environment or culture (Papers: Nicole Ling Yeo-Teh & Bor Tang | June 2020)

What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity (Papers: Lex Bouter | January 2020)

How Universities Cover Up Scientific Fraud – Areo (Justin T Pickett | February 2020)

It’s time to end the code of silence at universities – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | November 2018)

(UK) British universities fail at research integrity self-regulation – Nature INDEX (Dalmeet Singh Chawla | July 2018)

(UK) UK House of Commons committee wants to make sure “university investigations into research misconduct are handled appropriately” – Retraction Watch (C. K. Gunsalus | July 2018)

(UK) We need more investigations into research misconduct – The Guardian (Norman Lamb MP | July 2018)

Nine pitfalls of research misconduct – Science (Aaron D. Robinson | May 2018)

Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility (Papers: C.K. Gunsalus, JD, et al | 2018)

‘Fraud and Misconduct in Research’ – Inside Higher Ed (Nick Roll | December 2017)

Allan and Richard Smith discuss misconduct and fraud in clinical research – The Business of Discovery (Audio interview: Professor Allan Gaw | February 2017)

Why research integrity isn’t just “somebody else’s problem” – LSTM Seminar Series (Webinar: Elizabeth Wager | October 2016)

5 Ways Supervisors Can Promote Research Integrity (Resources: ORI | 2016)

Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (Papers: Ana Marusic, et al | 2016)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in