Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Ten principles for generating accessible and useable COVID‐19 environmental science and a fit‐for‐purpose evidence base (Papers: Andrew N. Kadykalo | February 2021)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Human Research Ethics, Research Integrity on March 23, 2021
Keywords: Beneficence, Consent, Human research ethics, Protection for participants, Research results, Respect for persons

The Linked Original Item was Posted On February, 4 2021

Graphic of a clinician in scrubs with the words "INFECTION CONTROL" with falling COVID-19 icons

Abstract
1. The ‘anthropause’, a period of unusually reduced human activity and mobility due to COVID‐19 restrictions, has serendipitously opened up unique opportunities for research on how human activities impact the environment.

2. In the field of health, COVID‐19 research has led to concerns about the quality of research papers and the underlying research and publication processes due to accelerated peer review and publication schedules, increases in pre‐prints and retractions.

A very practical set of suggestions for ecological COVID-19 research that makes a contribution to the body of knowledge and practice.

3. In the field of environmental science, framing the pandemic and associated global lockdowns as an unplanned global human confinement experiment with urgency should raise the same concerns about the rigorousness and integrity of the scientific process. Furthermore, the recognition of an ‘infodemic’, an unprecedented explosion of research, risks research waste and duplication of effort, although how information is used is as important as the quality of evidence. This highlights the need for an evidence base that is easy to find and use – that is discoverable, curated, synthesizable, synthesized.

4. We put forward a list of 10 key principles to support the establishment of a reproducible, replicable, robust, rigorous, timely and synthesizable COVID‐19 environmental evidence base that avoids research waste and is resilient to the pressures to publish urgently. These principles focus on engaging relevant actors (e.g. local communities, rightsholders) in research design and production, statistical power, collaborations, evidence synthesis, research registries and protocols, open science and transparency, data hygiene (cleanliness) and integrity, peer review transparency, standardized keywords and controlled vocabularies.

Keywords
conservation evidence, COVID‐19, data hygiene, environmental, evidence, evidence synthesis, evidence‐based conservation, evidence‐informed decision‐making, knowledge co‐production, open science, registered reports

Kadykalo, AN., Haddaway, NR., Rytwinski, T., Cooke, SJ. (2021) Ten principles for generating accessible and useable COVID‐19 environmental science and a fit‐for‐purpose evidence base. Ecological Solutions and Evidence. 2021; 2:e12041. https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12041
Publisher (Open Access): https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2688-8319.12041

Related Reading

Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Retracted Articles on COVID-19 (Papers: Hiba Khan | February 2022)

Are too many scientists studying Covid? – Knowable Magazine (Julie K. Pfeiffer and Terence S. Derm | January 2021)

How COVID-19 could make science kinder – Nature Index (Gemma Conroy | February 2021)

Elsevier journals ask Retraction Watch to review COVID-19 papers – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | March 2021)

Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in an Age of COVID-19: An Investigation into the Use of Preprints by Digital Media Outlets (Papers Alice Fleerackers, et al | January 2021)

Scientists Need to Be Kinder to One Another – Scientific American (Naomi Oreskes | February 2021 issue)

Changes in the Scientific Information Environment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Importance of Scientific Situational Awareness in Responding to the Infodemic – Mary Ann Liebert, Inc (John K. Iskander | December 2020)

List of retracted COVID-19 papers grows past 70 – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | December 2020)

Kindness alone won’t improve the research culture – Nature (Julie Gould | December 2020)

(Australia) Blacklist journals that keep research locked up, says Schmidt – Times Higher Education (John Ross | November 2020)

How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts – Nature (Holly Else | December 2020)

Ivan Oransky on Scientific Papers – The Body of Evidence (Interview | November 2020)

Disseminating Scientific Results in the Age of Rapid Communication – EOS (Shobha Kondragunta, et al | October 2020)

The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality (Papers: Katrina A Bramstedt | October 2020)

On Clarifying the Goals of a Peer Review Taxonomy – Scholarly Kitchen (Micah Altman & Philip N. Cohenoct | October 2020)

Coronavirus in context: Scite.ai tracks positive and negative citations for COVID-19 literature – Nature (Roxanne Khamsi | May 2020)

Covid-19 Research Scandals Illustrate What’s Wrong With Science – Elemental (Dana G Smith | August 2020)

The need for rigor: Retractions can damage public trust – HealthyDebate (Pippa Wysong | July 2020)

I Was Wrong: We Can’t Skip Phase 3 Vaccine Trials – Forbes (Steven Salzberg | August 2020)

Despite its big COVID moment, science is in crisis – Crickey (Stephen Bartos | August 2020)

Rushing Science in the Face of a Pandemic Is Understandable but Risky

The Science Sleuth Holding Fraudulent Research Accountable – leapsmag (Kira Peikoff | August 2020)

Controversial ‘human challenge’ trials for COVID-19 vaccines gain support – Science (Jon Cohen | July 2020)

Science by press release: When the story gets ahead of the science – CNN (Dr. Sanjay Gupta | June 2020)

Data show panic and disorganization dominate the study of Covid-19 drugs – STAT (Matthew Herper | July 2020)

Column: How a retracted research paper contaminated global coronavirus research – Los Angles Times (Michael Hiltzik | June 2020)

Assuring research integrity during a pandemic – BMJopinion (Gowri Gopalakrishna, et al | June 2020)

A fascinating history of clinical trials from their beginnings in Babylon – Medium (Prof. Adrian Esterman | April 2020)

The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories – Nature (Philip Ball & Amy Maxmen | May 2020)

Ethical guidelines for COVID-19 tracing apps – Nature (Jessica Morley, et al | May 2020)

Should We Purposely Infect Healthy Volunteers With Covid-19? – WIRED (Victoria Turk | May 2020)

(China) Chinese state censorship of COVID-19 research represents a looming crisis for academic publishers – London School of Economics Impact Blog (George Cooper | April 2020)

Pseudoscience and COVID-19 — we’ve had enough already – Nature (Timothy Caulfield | April 2020)

(COVID-19) Underpromise, overdeliver – Science (Editorial – H. Holden Thorp | March 2020)

Will the coronavirus kill off the ‘dinosaur’ world of academic publishing? – South China Morning Post (Linda Lew | March 2020)

Strong caveats are lacking as news stories trumpet preliminary COVID-19 research – HealthNewsReview (Mary Chris Jaklevic | April 2020)

The Science of This Pandemic Is Moving at Dangerous Speeds – WIRED (Adam Marcus & Ivan Oransky | March 2020)

Flattening the Curve, Then What? – The Hastings Center – Infographic Now Added (Mark A. Rothstein | March 2020)

Is it right to cut corners in the search for a coronavirus cure? – The Guardian (Julian Savulescu | March 2020)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in