Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Retraction Watch (Interview: Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky | February 2022)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on March 23, 2022
Keywords: Breaches, Good practice, Institutional responsibilities, Research integrity, Research Misconduct, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On February, 11 2022

The Retraction Watch logo

A Discussion with Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky

Listen to this interview of Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky, cofounders of Retraction Watch. We talk about lots of things, retracting very few.

Retraction Watch does incredibly important work in the Research Integrity space and supporting good institutional, researcher and research office practice.  This interview is well a listen by anyone who is interested in retractions and the future of academic research.

Ivan Oransky : “Accountability in science certainly does not come down to only retracting papers, because there are just lots of issues. And by the way, just to remind everyone, science is very much a human endeavor. It doesn’t exist outside of humans doing the science. I mean, facts exist, and there is truth out there, and we’d very much appear to be getting close and closer to it — that’s not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about the actual process, like, how do we learn these things. How — as this podcast more generally looks at — how does knowledge get known. Basically, epistemology. But that requires human beings. It requires human beings interpreting, talking and listening, collaborating, and so that’s one part of science that is really critical. Therefore, of course, the issue of accountability is multifactorial.”

The Retraction Watch database is here. You might also be interested in this article: “Repeat Offenders: When Scientific Fraudsters Slip Through the Cracks.” You can learn more about retraction here.

Retraction Watch: A Discussion with Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky
Retraction Watch: A Discussion with Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky

Related Reading

Journal editor explains ban on manuscripts from Russian institutions – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | March 2022)

How hijacked journals keep fooling one of the world’s leading databases – Retraction Watch (Anna Abalkina | May 2021)

“Fabulous document”, “very helpful guidance”: Sleuths react to recommendations for handling image integrity issues – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | September 2021)

25,000: That’s how many retractions are now in the Retraction Watch Database – Retraction Watch (April 2021)

Ivan Oransky on Scientific Papers – The Body of Evidence (Interview | November 2020)

It’s Time to Get Serious About Research Fraud – UnDark (Dalmeet Singh Chawla | July 2020)

“Our current approaches are not working:” Time to make misconduct investigation reports public, says integrity expert – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | June 2019)

Cribbing from Kribbe: UK criminology prof loses four papers for plagiarism – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | January 2019)

Are you liable for misconduct by scientific collaborators? What a recent court decision could mean for scientists – Retraction Watch (Richard Goldstein | August 2018)

The retraction process needs work. Is there a better way? – Retraction Watch (Alison McCook | March 2018)

(Australian and New Zealand case with international coauthors) Big journal, big correction (Alison Abritis | February 2018)

“A concerning – largely unrecognised – threat to patient safety:” Nursing reviews cite retracted trials – Retraction Watch (Alison McCook | January 2018)

Searchable Retraction Watch database

How to better flag retractions? Here’s what PubMed is trying – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky July 2016)

Ready to geek out on retraction data? Read this new preprint – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky 2015)

Retraction Watch blog

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in