Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Principles of Māori & Indigenous research ethics (An annotated bibliography by Dr Lily George)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Human Research Ethics on February 9, 2021
Keywords: First People, Human research ethics, Justice, New Zealand, Respect for persons

The Linked Original Item was Posted On September, 2 2021

Māori totem pictured against an idyllic sky

Te pitau me te koru: The pitau is the young succulent shoot of a fern, often equated with the koru. The spiral design symbolises new life, growth, strength and peace. In the bottom half of this design, the koru represents the movement of different knowledge systems when they choose to move in the same direction while maintaining the integrity of their separate knowledges. The clear space of the diamond in the centre is reminiscent of the huarau fern that creeps across the whenua (land) of Aotearoa (NZ), sending out new shoots to explore new lands and new knowledge. This space is also reminiscent of Te Kore, the Void, the space in creation of great emptiness, and therefore of great potential. The upper half of the design – te pitau – represents the unfurling of new knowledge as different knowledge systems move together, converge, then separate, converge, then separate. Again, they maintain the integrity of their separate knowledge systems while choosing to share knowledge at different points to create new knowledge of relevance to all.AHRECS has been engaged by a New Zealand university to work on a number of projects, including drafting a New Zealand equivalent to the popular Griffith University Research Ethics Manual (GUREM) – https://www.griffith.edu.au/research/research-services/research-ethics-integrity/human/gurem.

To inform our work, AHRECS commissioned Dr Lily George to produce a bibliography around the topics of Māori & Indigenous research ethics.

Lily served as Acting Chair of Massey University’s Human Ethics Committee (Northern) (2015-2017), as Chair of the New Zealand Ethics Committee (2017-2020), and chief editor of Indigenous research ethics: Claiming research sovereignty beyond the colonial legacy (Emerald Publishing, 2020).

AHRECS also commissioned TJ Reti to produce some artwork (see right) to accompany the bibliography.  TJ Reti is a young Indigenous artist from the Te Kapotai tribe of northern Aotearoa New Zealand. Expressing her cultural connections through art is TJ’s passion, as this articulates the love she has for the family and lands to whom she belongs.

Attached is a copy of the bibliography.

The attached version is watermarked and has copy protection.  A clean and more open version will be posted to https://www.ahrecs.vip and https://www.patreon.com/ahrecs. It will be available to our institution and $15/month subscribers.

We believe this is an important piece of scholarly work.

Access the free copy of the bibliography
Copy on https://www.ahrecs.vip

Related Reading

‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews (Papers: Anna Mae Scott, et al | January 2021)

A preliminary geneaology of research ethics review and Māori

What universities can learn from one of science’s biggest frauds – Nature (Holly Else – June 2019)

Te Mana Raraunga Statement on 2018 New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings: A Call for Action on Māori Census Data

(New Zealand) Consultation on new Code of Professional Standards and Ethics (Royal Society | March 2018)

Funding debate over paper quality vs quantity – Nature Index (Dyani Lewis | September 2017)

Researchers under scrutiny after noise experiment prompts ‘violent’ reaction – Brisbane Times (Peter Hannam | November 2017)

What does organizational diversity in New Zealand tertiary sector research ethics committees teach us about balancing consultative and governance approaches to ethics review? (Papers: Helen Gremillion, et al 2016)

A narrative account of ethics committees and their codes (Papers: Martin Tolich September 2016)

One size does not fit all: organisational diversity in New Zealand tertiary sector ethics committees (Papers: Martin Tolich et al 2015)

Co-design and implementation research: Challenges and solutions for ethics committees (Papers: Felicity Goodyear-Smith, et al 2015)

The Politicisation of Ethics Review in New Zealand (Book: Martin Tolich and Barry Smith 2015)

Lay members of New Zealand research ethics committees: Who and what do they represent? (Papers: Gremillion et al 2015)

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • In the news

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • In the news

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Menu
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Menu
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
Menu
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f
Twitter
Linkedin-in