Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
What was that say
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Preprints Involving Medical Research—Do the Benefits Outweigh the Challenges? (Editorial: Annette Flanagin, et al | November 2020)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on April 1, 2023
Keywords: Journal, Peer review, Publication ethics, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On November, 10 2020 16:47:06

Focused young African American female researcher or student looking at laptop holding book learning, serious black woman working or studying with computer doing research or preparing for exam online

A preprint is a complete manuscript posted to a preprint server by authors before peer review and publication in a journal. The goals of preprints are to enable authors to obtain timely feedback and comments on research before submission to a peer-reviewed journal, to claim provenance of an idea, and to facilitate and expedite dissemination of and access to research. Preprints can be amended or updated, commented on by others, and remain on the preprint server even if subsequently published in a journal. They can be cited and indexed and increasingly are given attention in the news and social media.1

Preprints definitely came of age during the awful trials of the COVID-19 pandemic. They provided a means by which scientists could quickly and democratically distribute insights and analysis. It also opened that work to immediate feedback, comments and suggestions. But preprint publication is not without drawbacks. They have not been subject to peer review or editorial scrutiny.  This editorial from 2020 takes a look at whether the benefits justify the risks.  It is worthwhile noting that flawed and problematic papers are still published by peer reviewed journals and peer review is not without its own serious problem.

In clinical medicine, the ultimate aim of research is to improve patient outcomes and public health. Whether preprint posting and rapid dissemination of non–peer-reviewed reports of medical research that could have important clinical implications and consequences help achieve the goal of improving health outcomes for patients without causing harm remains uncertain.

Preprint servers, which are increasing in number, host and archive preprint manuscripts. Considered the first preprint server, arXiv was launched in 1991 for physics researchers to share scientific reports with each other before journal publication.2 Before that, in 1961, the US National Institutes of Health began a preprint program for sharing biological preprints, known as Information Exchange Groups, but this program was discontinued in 1967 after journals refused to consider submissions previously posted as preprints.3 In 2013, bioRxiv was launched for preprints in biology and the life sciences, and in 2019, medRxiv, dedicated to health sciences, began. As of September 2020, there were at least 61 public preprint servers covering many disciplines; one-third (21) of these have been launched since 2018, and an increasing number permit the posting of preprints in medicine and health.4 Preprint servers are managed and supported by a range of financial models, including support from professional societies, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, and funders, and more recently, large publishers, and some servers require a fee for preprint posting.

Flanagin A., Fontanarosa PB., Bauchner H. (2020) Preprints Involving Medical Research—Do the Benefits Outweigh the Challenges? JAMA. 2020;324(18):1840–1843. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.20674
Publisher (Open Access): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2772743

Preprints Involving Medical Research—Do the Benefits Outweigh the Challenges?
A preprint is a complete manuscript posted to a preprint server by authors before peer review and publication in a journal. The goals of preprints are to enable authors to obtain timely feedback and comments on research before submission to a peer-reviewed journal, to claim provenance of an idea,…

Related Reading

(US) Delivering on NIH data sharing requirements: avoiding Open Data in Appearance Only (Papers: Hope Watson et. al. | June 2023)

Preprints Involving Medical Research—Do the Benefits Outweigh the Challenges? (Editorial: Annette Flanagin, et al | November 2020)

(Global) PreprintMatch: A tool for preprint to publication detection shows global inequities in scientific publication (Papers: Peter Eckmann & Anita Bandrowski | March 2023)

Researchers push preprint reviews to improve scientific communications – Science (Jeffrey Brainard | December 2022)

Rise of the preprint: how rapid data sharing during COVID-19 has changed science forever – Nature (Clare Watson | January 2022)

ARC bans preprints, again – Campus Morning Mail

Preprints and open peer review come of age – Research Information (February 2022)

Preprints ‘largely unchanged’ by peer review, even during Covid – Times Higher Education (Simon Baker | February 2022)

Publishing of COVID-19 preprints in peer-reviewed journals, preprinting trends, public discussion and quality issues (Papers: Ivan Kodvanj, et al | January 2022)

Opinion: In Defense of Preprints – The Scientist (Richard Sever & John Inglis | November 2021)

The dangers of undercooked science and a hungry public – The Seattle Times (Seth S. Leopold | November 2021)

Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services (Preprint Papers: Boya Xie, et al | February 2021)

Preprint advocates must also fight for research integrity – Nature (Gowri Gopalakrishna | September 2021)

(Australia) ‘Devastating career event’: scientists caught out by change to Australian Research Council fine print – The Guardian (Donna Lum | August 2021)

Preprints Are Not Going to Replace Journals – Scholarly Kitchen (Haseeb Irfanullah | June 2021)

Imposters and Impersonators in Preprints: How do we trust authors in Open Science? – Scholarly Kitchen (Leslie D. Mcintosh | March 2021)

(EU) How pandemic-driven preprints are driving open scrutiny of research – Horizon (Rex Merrifield | April 2021)

Communicating Scientific Uncertainty in an Age of COVID-19: An Investigation into the Use of Preprints by Digital Media Outlets (Papers Alice Fleerackers, et al | January 2021)

Pivotal Year for Preprints – Inside Higher Ed (Lilah Burke | January 2021)

Changes in the Scientific Information Environment During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Importance of Scientific Situational Awareness in Responding to the Infodemic – Mary Ann Liebert, Inc (John K. Iskander | December 2020)

Preprinting a pandemic: the role of preprints in the COVID-19 pandemic (Pre-Print Papers: Nicholas Fraser, et al | May 2020)

Disseminating Scientific Results in the Age of Rapid Communication – EOS (Shobha Kondragunta, et al | October 2020)

Science Communications In the Time of Coronavirus – WYNC Studios (March 2020)

Advocating for publishing peer review – ASAbio (Iain Cheeseman | April 2018)

Preprints and Citations: Should Non-Peer Reviewed Material Be Included in Article References? – Scholarly Kitchen (David Crotty | March 2018)

Ask The Chefs: Where Does Open Access Go From Here? – Scholarly Kitchen (Ann Michael | October 2017)

What Is “Open Science”? (And Why Some Researchers Want It) – Futurism (Elizabeth Gilbert, Katie Corker | June 2017)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in