Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

International Scientific Cooperation – Challenges and Predicaments (Booklet: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen | August 2014)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on October 18, 2021
Keywords: Breaches, Collaborative research, Good practice, International, Research integrity, Research Misconduct, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On August, 15 2014

A team of collaborators reaching across a table to connect.

Preface
The academic endeavour has been a global activity for centuries, with researchers collaborating internationally in order to broaden and deepen their knowledge and scope.

I am convinced that science and the liberal arts can offer solutions to social issues, that they can help exploit opportunities and that society in general can benefit from sharing knowledge. I also believe that knowledge and democracy belong together.

This incredibly helpful booklet (Creative Commons – Attribution) published from the Netherlands in August 2014 offers some valuable tips and ideas for research teams that include international collaborators. A recommended read for researches of all experience levels.  We have included links to 22 related items.

Sometimes, however, it is prudent to set limits to international scientific cooperation.

There are two reasons for this. Firstly, history shows that science can be misused, scientific integrity can be violated, and researchers can be compromised. It is better to prevent this than to criticise and regret what has gone wrong. We are better off assessing risks on time and acting accordingly.

Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW) (2014). International scientific cooperation challenges and predicaments. Options for risk assessment. Amsterdam. https://knaw.nl/en/news/publications/international-scientific-cooperation-challenges-and-predicaments

International Scientific Cooperation - Challenges and Predicaments — KNAW
(2014, Committee for the Freedom of Scientific Pursuit ) This booklet discusses the challenges and predicaments of international scientific cooperation. It addresses the responsibility of researchers and administrators to make potential conflicts clear in advance and offers them an analytical fram…

Related Reading

Librarians seek more support as research partners – Nature (Anthea Lacchia | September 2021)

‘We need to talk’: ways to prevent collaborations breaking down – Nature (Virginia Gewin | June 2021)

Co-authorship in the Humanities and Social Sciences – Author Services (Resource: Taylor & Francis | September 2017)

The authorship rows that sour scientific collaborations – Nature (Nic Fleming | June 2021)

How we deal with authorship and author disputes – Cell Mentor (Alex Lenkei | June 2021)

Ethics in global research: Creating a toolkit to support integrity and ethical action throughout the research journey (Papers: Corinne Reid, et al | February 2021)

(EU) Largest ever research integrity survey flounders as universities refuse to cooperate – Science (Jop de Vrieze | November 2020)

How to manage a multi-author megapaper – Nature Index (Jack Leeming | November 2019)

Honesty in authorship. Who’s on first? – Hindawi (Eva Amsen | January 2020)

A colleague included plagiarized material in your grant proposal. Are you liable? – Retraction Watch (Richard Goldstein | December 2018)

Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration (Papers: Zen Faulkes | 2018)

Research with, not about, communities – Ethical guidance towards empowerment in collaborative research, a report for the TRUST project – TRUST (Kate Chatfield, et al | July 2018)

Are you liable for misconduct by scientific collaborators? What a recent court decision could mean for scientists – Retraction Watch (Richard Goldstein | August 2018)

Costly Collaborations: The Impact of Scientific Fraud on Co‐Authors’ Careers (Papers: Philippe Mongeona and Vincent Larivièreb | January 2015)

Authorship and Team Science – JAMA Network (Editorial | Phil Fontanarosa, et al | December 2017)

All for one or one for all? Authorship and the cross-sectoral valuation of credit in nutrition science (Papers: Bart Penders | 2017)

Coming to Grips with Coauthor Responsibility – TheScientist (Catherine Offord | May 2017)

Data Ownership Guidelines (Resources: Example from an Australian school of Applied Psychology | 2016)

The Ethics of Collaboration Whose Culture? Whose Intellectual Property? Who Benefits? (Claire Smith and Gary Jackson 2007)

Co-design and implementation research: Challenges and solutions for ethics committees (Papers: Felicity Goodyear-Smith, et al 2015)

Authorship abuse is the dark side of collaboration – Times Higher Education (Bruce Macfarlane 2015)

Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in