Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Ethical Issues in Social Media Recruitment for Clinical Studies: Ethical Analysis and Framework (Bettina M Zimmermann, et al | June 2021)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Human Research Ethics on May 19, 2022
Keywords: Clinical trial, Consent, Good practice, Privacy, Researcher responsibilities, Respect for persons

The Linked Original Item was Posted On June, 14 2021

A chain link viewed through a page of translucent binary code.

Abstract

Background:
Social media recruitment for clinical studies holds the promise of being a cost-effective way of attracting traditionally marginalized populations and promoting patient engagement with researchers and a particular study. However, using social media for recruiting clinical study participants also poses a range of ethical issues.

Objective:
This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the ethical benefits and risks to be considered for social media recruitment in clinical studies and develop practical recommendations on how to implement these considerations.

Given the widespread and regular use of social media, it can be viewed as an attractive tool for recruitment in clinical research. But its use isn’t without its ethical challenges and limitations.  Like many complex problems in human research ethics, the considerations and potential solutions are not homogeneous and require a nuanced approach, depending on the specifics of a project’s design and its context. This open access paper looks at the considerations and is a recommended read for researchers and research ethics committee members.

Methods:
On the basis of established principles of clinical ethics and research ethics, we reviewed the conceptual and empirical literature for ethical benefits and challenges related to social media recruitment. From these, we derived a conceptual framework to evaluate the eligibility of social media use for recruitment for a specific clinical study.

Results:
We identified three eligibility criteria for social media recruitment for clinical studies: information and consent, risks for target groups, and recruitment effectiveness. These criteria can be used to evaluate the implementation of a social media recruitment strategy at its planning stage. We have discussed the practical implications of these criteria for researchers.

Conclusions:
The ethical challenges related to social media recruitment are context sensitive. Therefore, social media recruitment should be planned rigorously, taking into account the target group, the appropriateness of social media as a recruitment channel, and the resources available to execute the strategy.

Zimmermann, B., Willem, T., Bredthauer, C. & Buyx, A. (2021) Ethical Issues in Social Media Recruitment for Clinical Studies: Ethical Analysis and Framework. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 24(5):e31231 DOI: 10.2196/31231
Publisher (Open Access): https://www.jmir.org/2022/5/e31231

Ethical Issues in Social Media Recruitment for Clinical Studies: Ethical Analysis and Framework
Background: Social media recruitment for clinical studies holds the promise of being a cost-effective way of attracting traditionally marginalized populations and promoting patient engagement with researchers and a particular study. However, using social media for recruiting clinical study participa…

Related Reading

Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics by Townsend and Wallace (Guidance: Dr Leanne Townsend & Prof. Claire Wallace | 2016)

(US) Safeguards for human studies can’t cope with big data – Nature (Nathaniel Raymond | April 2019)

Academic Behind Cambridge Analytica Data Mining Sues Facebook for Defamation – New York Times (Matthew Rosenberg | March 2019)

Social and Communicative Functions of Informed Consent Forms in East Asia and Beyond (Papers: Go Yoshizawa, et al | 2017)

Social Media Research & Ethics

Ethical Research Protocols for Social Media Health Research (Papers: Adrian Benton, et al | 2017)

Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations (Papers: Luke Gelinas, et al | 2017)

Tinder research raises ethical worries for academics – Times Higher Education (Jack Grove 2016)

Internet research ethics (Norwegian National Committees for Research Ethics 2015)

#SocialEthics: A guide to embedding ethics in social media research (Papers: Evans et al 2015)

Call for better ethical standards in social media research – Research (Jane Bainbridge 2015)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in