ACN - 101321555 Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Resource Library

Research Ethics MonthlyAbout Us

ResourcesHuman Research EthicsConsent based on trust rather than information? – The Ethics Blog (Pär Segerdahl | March 2017)

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Consent based on trust rather than information? – The Ethics Blog (Pär Segerdahl | March 2017)

Published/Released on March 21, 2017 | Posted by Admin on April 9, 2017 / , , , , ,
 


View full details | Go to resource


Consent to research participation has two dimensions. On the one hand, the researcher wants to do something with the participant: we don’t know what until the researcher tells. To obtain consent, the researcher must provide information about what will be done, what the purpose is, what the risks and benefits are – so that potential participants can decide whether to consent or not.

On the other hand, potential participants would hardly believe the information and consider consenting, if they didn’t trust the researcher or the research institution. If trust is strong, they might consent even without considering the information. Presumably, this occurs often.

The fact that consent can be given based on trust has led to a discussion of trust-based consent as more or less a separate form of consent, next to informed consent. An article in the journal Bioethics, for example, argues that consent based on trust is not morally inferior to consent based on information. Consent based on trust supports autonomy, voluntariness, non-manipulation and non-exploitation as much as consent based on information does, the authors argue.

Read the rest of this discussion piece



Resources Menu

Research Integrity


Human Research Ethics

0