Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(Australia) The Essence Of Ethics For Psychological Researchers And Psychologists (Resource: Tanya Machin And Charlotte Brownlow | January 2021)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Human Research Ethics on September 27, 2022
Keywords: Australia, Ethical review, Good practice, Human research ethics, Protection for participants, Researcher responsibilities, Social Science, Training

The Linked Original Item was Posted On January, 21 2021

A word cloud around the concept of social science.

This chapter uses material from an open access human research ethics e-course developed with the support of an Open Access Teaching Award from the University of Southern Queensland. The original authors were Tanya Machin, Charlotte Brownlow, and Annmaree Jackson. The e-course can be found at https://open.usq.edu.au/course/view.php?id=400 or by directly contacting Tanya at Tanya.Machin@usq.edu.au or Charlotte at Charlotte.Brownlow@usq.edu.au.

INTRODUCTION

Ethical conduct in psychology research in Australia is guided by National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research, as well as professional codes of conduct. This resource provides a useful reconciled resource. We recommend its inclusion in your institutions resource library.

Our aim in this chapter is to provide you with a broad overview of the different ethical codes used in Australia that psychological scientists and psychologists use to guide their work. As a psychology student you’re no doubt used to thinking about ethics as this underpins much of the foundational knowledge you learn in your degree. However, you may be unfamiliar with why ethics are important (although we hope not!) or when or how ethical codes are used. The first ethical code was developed by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and is known as The National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (NHMRC, 2018b) or the ‘NHMRC code’ or simply ‘the code’. This document consists of a series of guidelines that all researchers – including psychological scientists – need to follow. Australia is unique in that our researchers are governed by this code, but our psychologists are required to adhere to a different ethical code developed by the Australian Psychological Society. Countries such as the United Kingdom or Canada have a combined professional and research code of ethics.

To help you work your way through the chapter, we’ve divided it into several sections, including: ‘Why Do We Have Research Ethics?’, ‘Research Methodology and Risk Management’, ‘Recruitment and Data Collection’, ‘Data and Information Management’, and ‘Merit, Integrity, and Monitoring’. We will then provide a brief overview of the APS code to close the chapter off. Throughout the chapter, we’ll provide some case studies, pose questions for you to reflect on, and perhaps even test your ethical knowledge! Finally, the information contained in this chapter comes from an open access e-course that we wrote. If you have any questions about the e-course or want to use it in your course or program, please contact the authors directly.

WHY DO WE HAVE RESEARCH ETHICS?

The history of human experimentation is sometimes considered to be a dark one, with many documented examples of ill-conceived and inhumane medical and psychological experimentation on human beings. While considered ‘unethical’ by today’s standards, these experiments have led to the development and refinement of various national and international laws and guidelines that govern ethical human research.

Machin, T., & Brownlow, C. (2022). The essence of ethics for psychological researchers and psychologists. In T. Machin, T. Machin, C. Jeffries & N. Hoare (Eds.), The Australian handbook for careers in psychological science. University of Southern Queensland. https://usq.pressbooks.pub/psychologycareers/chapter/ethics/

The Essence of Ethics for Psychological Researchers and Psychologists – The Australian Handbook for Careers in Psychological Science
Tanya Machin and Charlotte Brownlow

Related Reading

Pursuing compliance or ethical excellence?

(Australia) The impact of adding “impact of research” to approval guidelines – Campus Morning Mail (Adrian Barnett | July 2022)

HREC decision-making about social research with children: the influence of payment, risk and method

The challenge of being ‘fit for purpose’

Adele’s Adventures in Wonderland*: Reflections on a 12-year journey in ethics, research integrity and so much more

Investigating an ethical barrier – should HRECs require gatekeeper approval from universities before external research?

What do HREC members think and do when deciding about children’s participation in social research? Results from the MESSI survey

Think of, and treat, consent as a powerful and complex verb, not a strictly defined and constrained noun

Regulation of human epigenetic editing: ensuring international frameworks for governing Human Genome Editing don’t impede vital medical research

Why resourcing practice is a better option for institutions than policing compliance

Internal Human Research Ethics annual reporting

Research ethics reviews: responding to the challenges faced by international postgraduate students

Element Zero: What’s missing from the National Statement to support Consumer and Community Involvement in health research?

The Tower of Babel and Human Research Ethics

A big bear trap on the horizon

Why human research ethics and research integrity aren’t fire blankets

Should we accept funding for facial recognition research, and other dilemmas?

A poor call and two missed opportunities, but otherwise not a bad proposed revision to NS s5

Is it time to extend the required membership of research ethics committees?

Worried your researchers might not be treating human research ethics as a core component of good research practice? Concerned they are not seeing it as their responsibility?

When Research is the treatment: why the research/clinical care divide doesn’t always work

Vulnerability in human research (Papers: Ian J. Pieper & Colin J. H. Thomson AM | April 2020)

Can I use your answers anyway?

Lost time may never be found again but is it time to talk about the duration of ethics approvals?

A users perspective on the ethics application process in Australia-room for improvement

The research use of online data/web 2.0 comments

Clergy service to HRECs: the useful paradox within secular governance of research involving human participants

Ethics, Security and Privacy – the Bermuda Triangle of data management?

The need to seek institutional approval to survey staff – was this a misunderstanding of the purpose of Guideline 2.2.13 in the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research?

Smarter proportional research ethics review

Should you be worried about paying children to take part in research?

Research Ethics Review as a Box-Ticking Exercise

We respect you… we just don’t need to hear from you anymore: Should the consumer and their community participate in research as partners instead of just being subjects?

Is it something I said (or the way I said it)?

Monitoring research is too important to be optional and too resource intensive to be manual

Why do we need Category D appointments on HRECs and how should we find suitable people?

Institutional approaches to evaluative practice

Conducting research with (not on) consumers in health – exploring ethical considerations

Including People with Dementia in Research: An Analysis of Australian Ethical and Legal Rules and Recommendations for Reform (Papers: Nola M. Ries, et al | 2017)

Beneficence as a Principle in Human Research

Get access to some great resources (two examples included in this post) and support events like the Constructive Voices panels

The value of respect in human research ethics: a conceptual analysis and a practical guide

Contextualising Merit and Integrity within Human Research (Papers: Ian Pieper and Colin Thomson | 2014)

Justice in Human Research Ethics: A Conceptual and Practical Guide

Contextualising Merit and Integrity within Human Research: A Summary

Keeping research on track II

The complex art of benefit-sharing

National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) – Updated with new link to July 2018 update

Can Your HREC Benefit from Coaching?

Guidance and supplementary guidance: Safety monitoring and reporting in clinical trials involving therapeutic goods (Guidance: NHMRC | 2018)

“More what you’d call guidelines”

What’s at risk? Who’s responsible? Moving beyond the physical, the immediate, the proximate, and the individual

Use of Imported Human Biospecimens in Research

Magical incantations and the tyranny of the template

Ethical use of social media as a recruitment tool

‘Except as required by law’: Australian researchers’ legal rights and obligations regarding participant confidentiality

Beneficence as a principle in human research (Papers: Ian Pieper & Colin Thomson 2016)

Reflections on case: ‘Racist bus drivers project’

The seductive peril of precedent-based decision making

Statement on Consumer and Community Participation in Health and Medical Research (the Statement on Participation) – NHMRC

NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE (CPMP/ICH/135/95) – Annotated with TGA comments

Investigating Human Research Ethics in Practice: Project Report (ARC Project Report, Marilys Guillemin, et al 2008)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in