Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention (Papers: Owen W. Tomlinson | November 2022)

Posted by Connar Allen in Research Integrity on November 29, 2022
Keywords: Journal, Publication ethics, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On November, 11 2022

Redback Spider isolated on a white background, Australian Black Widow, closeup macro detail of deadly venomous spider.

Key points

  • 1,280 spam emails were received during a 5-year period starting with the first conference attendance—no emails were received until this point in the author’s career.
  • Spam emails from potentially predatory journals and conferences can be directly related to academic activity—conference attendance and publications.
  • The 990 spam emails from journals came from 111 publishers, of which 22 were from the State of Delaware (USA), with 6 publishers providing the same postal address.
  • Requests to unsubscribe from unsolicited emails have some success, but is limited since there is little action that can be taken against the publishers or journals.

Abstract

Academics and other researchers can attest with pained resignation to the email avalanche from questionable publishers/predatory publishers that slam their inboxes.   This interesting open access paper, published in November 2022, and the research it reports does an analysis of the wall of cachu dafad (it’s Wesh, look it up) that relentlessly overwhelms us.

Predatory publishers—those who do not adhere to rigorous standards of academic practice such as peer review—are increasingly infiltrating biomedical databases, to the detriment of the wider scientific community. These publishers frequently send unsolicited ‘spam’ emails to generate submission to their journals, with early career researchers (ECR) particularly susceptible to these practices because of pressures such as securing employment and promotion. This analysis sought to record and characterize the emails received over the course of a PhD and post-doctoral position (~8 years), as well as attempts to unsubscribe from such emails, using a progressive and step-wise manner. A total of 1,280 emails identified as academic spam were received (990 journal invitations, 220 conference invitations, 70 ‘other’). The first email was received 3 months after registration for an international conference. Attempts at unsubscribing were somewhat effective, whereby implications of reporting to respective authorities resulted in a 43% decrease in emails, although did not eliminate them completely, and therefore alternative approaches to eliminating academic spam may be needed. Ongoing education about predatory publishers, as well as action by key academic stakeholders, should look to reduce the impact these predatory publishers have upon the wider literature base.

Tomlinson, O.W. (2022), Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention. Learned Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1500
Publisher (Open Access): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1500

Logo of learned publishing.
Analysis of predatory emails in early career academia and attempts at prevention
Predatory publishers—those who do not adhere to rigorous standards of academic practice such as peer review—are increasingly infiltrating biomedical databases, to the detriment of the wider scientifi...

Related Reading

Predatory publishing 2.0: Why it is still a thing and what we can do about it – PLOS Community (Andreas Vilhelmsson | April 2022)

(UK) UUK ‘should sue predatory publishers over tsunami of spam’ – Times Higher Education (Jack Grove | July 2021)

The Troubling Allure of Predatory Publishing – The Goodmen Project (Research Outreach | October 2021)

(Pakistan) The rising menace of scholarly black-market Challenges and solutions for improving research in low-and middle-income countries – JPMA Editorial (Aamir Raoof Memon, Farooq Azam Rathore | June 2021

Questionable publishing practice? Are you harmed?

(India) India’s Fight Against Predatory Journals: An Interview with Professor Bhushan Patwardhan – Scholarly Kitchen (Tao Tao | February 2020)

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence – Nature (Agnes Grudniewicz, et al | December 2019)

Pondering on whether to submit your research output to a journal?

Fighting Citation Pollution — The Challenge of Detecting Fraudulent Journals in Works Cited – Scholarly Kitchen ( Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe and Michael Clarke | September 2019)

Mentors help authors say “no” to predatory journals – Elsevier Connect (Marilynn Larkin | November 2018)

Are we missing the true picture? Stop calling a moneybox, a fishing hook

Revisiting: Six Years of Predatory Publishing – Scholarly Kitchen (David Crotty | August 2018)

Authorship for sale: Some journals willing to add authors to papers they didn’t write – Retraction Watch (Alison McCook | September 2017)

Identifying Predatory Publishers – The Scientist (Tracy Vence | July 2017)

Beware! Academics are getting reeled in by scam journals – UA/AU (Alex Gillis | January 2017)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in