Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(Africa) Global Health Research in an Unequal World: Ethics Case Studies from Africa (Books: Gemma Aellah, et al | June 2016)

Posted by Connar Allen in Human Research Ethics on October 9, 2022
Keywords: Beneficence, Consent, Culture, International, Justice, Medical research, Privacy, Protection for participants, Respect for persons

The Linked Original Item was Posted On June, 30 2016

A panoramic view on the Masai Mara during a beautiful sunset

This interesting book looks at how we think about personal relationships in health research where the researcher is from an affluent country and the participant is from a developing country.  There are ethical challenges here that warrant careful reflection and considered action.  Our ethical guidance in this area needs to provide practical advice.  Helicopter research and ethical dumping is never acceptable.

CASE STUDIES

How can we best categorize the relationship between researcher and participant? One is paid; the other is not, yet is not a customer or receiving a service. One seems more powerful, yet cannot function without the other; he or she cannot proceed in the relationship without the other’s explicit consent. They are not friends, yet often share intimate details – albeit one-sided – about their lives. Their relationship is at once highly technical and sometimes deeply human. Furthermore, it is one which, while at first glance – in the moment of drawing blood or obtaining consent – seems to be a relationship between two individuals, in reality stands for relationships between whole populations, countries, governments and institutions.

Aellah G, Chantler T, Geissler PW. Global Health Research in an Unequal World: Ethics Case Studies from Africa. Oxfordshire (UK): CAB International; 2016. RESEARCHER-PARTICIPANT RELATIONSHIPS. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK458758/

A book cover.
RESEARCHER-PARTICIPANT RELATIONSHIPS - Global Health Research in an Unequal World: Ethics Case Studies from Africa - NCBI Bookshelf
How can we best categorize the relationship between researcher and participant? One is paid; the other is not, yet is not a customer or receiving a service. One seems more powerful, yet cannot function without the other; he or she cannot proceed in the relationship without the other’s explicit conse…

Related Reading

Equity must be baked into randomized controlled trials – Nature (Editorial | June 2022)

Nature addresses helicopter research and ethics dumping – Nature (Editorial | May 2022)

Global Code of Conduct for Research in Resource-Poor Settings (TRUST Resource | May 2018)

Undue Influence in Research Between High-Income and Lower-Income Countries

National and International Compliance Tools (Papers: Pamela Andanda, et al 2016)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in