Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

A Quality Checklist for Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Education: A proposal to complement the Predictive Modeling Tool (Papers: André Krom &Mariëtte van den Hoven | February 2021)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on March 29, 2021
Keywords: Good practice, Institutional responsibilities, Research integrity, Research results, Researcher responsibilities, Training

The Linked Original Item was Posted On January, 1 1970

Metal cogs stamped with the words "professional development'

An institution’s approach to professional development about Responsible Conduct of Research can reflect historical, cultural and personal issues that may not reflect genuine quality, this open access paper discusses a checklist to evaluate quality.

Abstract
This article presents a Quality Checklist for Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) education. The Checklist is a tool for teachers and educational developers in RCR education containing the results of eleven reviews on the impact of RCR education. It makes these data accessible in a layered way, such that users can quickly find the information that they are interested in. The tool can complement the Predictive Modeling Tool , which allows users to fill out information about a course and provides recommendations on how the course’s efficacy can be improved. We present our approach to developing the Quality Checklist prototype tool, the tool itself and how it can be used. We compare it to the PMT and discuss the added value of the Quality Checklist prototype tool, as well as its limitations. Finally, we indicate some of the ways in which the prototype tool could be further improved.

KEYWORDS:
Quality ChecklistResponsible Conduct of ResearcheducationefficacyPredictive Modeling Tool

Krom, A. & van den Hoven, M. (2021) A Quality Checklist for Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Education: A proposal to complement the Predictive Modeling Tool, Accountability in Research, DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1887736

Publisher (Open Access): https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08989621.2021.1887736

xxx

A Quality Checklist for Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Education: A proposal to complement the Predictive Modeling Tool
(2021). A Quality Checklist for Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Education: A proposal to complement the Predictive Modeling Tool. Accountability in Research. Ahead of Print.

 

Related Reading

(EU) Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe (Papers: Shila Abdi, et al | January 2021)

A Cautionary Tale for Psychology and Higher Education in Asia: Following Western Practices of Incentivising Scholarship May Have Negative Outcomes (Papers: Bruce B. Svare | March 2020)

(Australia) ‘Nurture trumps nature’ in PhD success – Times Higher Education (John Ross | August 2020)

Research ethics courses as a vaccination against a toxic research environment or culture (Papers: Nicole Ling Yeo-Teh & Bor Tang | June 2020)

Developing Grad Students’ Scientific Literacy Skills – Inside Higher Ed (David A. Sanders | February 2020)

Academic research integrity: Exploring researchers’ perceptions of responsibilities and enablers (Papers: Twan Huybers, et al | March 2020)

A randomized trial of a lab-embedded discourse intervention to improve research ethics – PNAS ( Dena K. Plemmons, et al | January 2020)

Is research integrity training a waste of time? – Nature (Gemma Conroy | February 2020)

The F-word, or how to fight fires in the research literature

Reboot undergraduate courses for reproducibility – Nature (Katherine Button | September 2018)

From lectures to the lab: three steps to becoming an undergraduate researcher – Nature (James Ankrum | July 2018)

A survey on data reproducibility and the effect of publication process on the ethical reporting of laboratory research (Papers: Delphine R Boulbes, et al | 2018)

What is ‘Necessary Training’ In Health-Related Research Ethics? – EthoxBlog (Kristine Bærøe | June 2017)

Designing integrated research integrity training: authorship, publication, and peer review (Papers: Mark Hooper, et al)

NSF reiterates policy on teaching good research habits despite its limitations – Science (Jeffrey Mervis | August 2017)

Think.Check.Submit

Reactively, Proactively, Implicitly, Explicitly? Academics’ Pedagogical Conceptions of how to Promote Research Ethics and Integrity (Papers: Heidi Hyytinen & Erika Löfström | 2017)

Why research integrity isn’t just “somebody else’s problem” – LSTM Seminar Series (Webinar: Elizabeth Wager | October 2016)

Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (Review) (Papers: Ana Marusic et al 2016)

We would all benefit from more research integrity research

Do interventions to reduce misconduct actually work? Maybe not, says new report – Retraction Watch (Alison McCook 2016)

Pedagogical Support for Responsible Conduct of Research Training (Papers: Misti Ault Anderson 2016)

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • In the news

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • In the news

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Menu
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
Menu
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map
Menu
  • Support
  • Contact Us
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f
Twitter
Linkedin-in