ACN - 101321555 Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)
Search
Generic filters
Exact text matches only
Search into
Filter by Categories
Research integrity
Filter by Categories
Human Research Ethics

Resource Library

Research Ethics MonthlyAbout Us

ResourcesHuman Research EthicsRethinking Vulnerability and Research: Defining the Need for a Post-Research Ethics Audit (Papers: Chesmal Siriwardhana 2015)

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Rethinking Vulnerability and Research: Defining the Need for a Post-Research Ethics Audit (Papers: Chesmal Siriwardhana 2015)

 


View full details | Go to resource #1, resource #2


Abstract: Vulnerability of research populations is a fundamental area of interest and debate in bioethics. Based on mental health research in a humanitarian setting context, I explore vulnerability-related issues and developing enhanced protective practices. Motivated by experience from mental health research among forced migrants, and faced with a lack of guidance in the sharing of ethical lessons, I explore the concept of post-research ethics audit as a mechanism for reflection that researchers working with vulnerable populations can use. Presently, a coherent post-research strategy to critically examine the quality of ethical frameworks, debrief researcher experience and explore ethical challenges in research implementation is unavailable. The more established clinical audit process can be a model for the post-research ethics audit due to conceptual similarities in improving current practices by comparing the ideal versus the real scenario and measuring the effect of implementing changes. The proposed strategy presents a feasible way of identifying discrepancies between existing guidance and actual on-field implementation of research. Such a concept, if supported by empirical evidence based on its applicability, adaptability and feasibility, can become a platform to identify participant community needs, perceive community-specific ethical challenges, identify gaps in ethical oversight, and examine researcher integrity and potential misconduct. However, such activity needs to be researcher- and ethics committee-friendly, easily adaptable and implementable within existing ethical oversight frameworks, to enhance researcher-driven ethical practices and promote participant involvement.

Siriwardhana C (2015) Rethinking Vulnerability and Research: Defining the Need for a Post-Research Ethics Audit. Asian Bioethics Review  7(2) 188-200 10.1353/asb.2015.0015
Publisher: https://www.asianbioethicsreview.com/journal/index.php?…
Project Muse: https://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/asian_bioethics_review/v007/7.2.siriwardhana.pdf



Related Reading

Resources Menu

Research Integrity


Human Research Ethics

0