ACN - 101321555 Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)
Search
Generic filters
Exact text matches only
Search into
Filter by Categories
Research integrity
Filter by Categories
Human Research Ethics

Resource Library

Research Ethics MonthlyAbout Us

ResourcesResearch IntegrityA publisher wants to destigmatize retractions. Here’s how – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | September 2019)

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

A publisher wants to destigmatize retractions. Here’s how – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | September 2019)

Published/Released on September 12, 2019 | Posted by Admin on October 15, 2019 / , , , , , , ,
 


View full details | Go to resource


It’s no secret that retractions have a stigma, which is very likely part of why authors often resist the move — even when honest error is involved. There have been at least a few proposals to change the nomenclature for some retractions over the years, from turning them into “amendments” to a new taxonomy.

Erica Boxheimer, data integrity analyst at EMBO Press, and Bernd Pulverer, chief editor of The EMBO Journal and head of scientific publications for the Press, have suggested a related solution, which builds on a 2015 proposal:

We proposed to use the term “withdrawal” instead of the canonical “retraction” for an author‐initiated retraction based on “honest mistakes”. We are now using the terms “retraction” and “withdrawal” as formally distinct content types across EMBO Press in the hope that “withdrawal” attracts less stigma and encourages self‐correction. 

Read the rest of this interview and discussion piece



Related Reading

Resources Menu

Research Integrity


Human Research Ethics

0