Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(Uzbekistan) Under pressure, Uzbek researchers flood academia with nonsense – eurasianet (David Trilling | August 2021)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on September 11, 2021
Keywords: Institutional responsibilities, International, Journal, Research results, Researcher responsibilities

The Linked Original Item was Posted On August 3, 2021

An artistically stressed flag of Uzbekistan

Some 98 percent of the articles Uzbek academics publish abroad appear in discredited journals.

Anyone tracking scholarship on Central Asia is sure to be swamped by Uzbek research in unreputable publications

This piece highlights the degree to which the reputational damage done by publishing in a questionable publication is much larger than to an individual researcher. Countries and institutions must actively urge their researchers away from questionable publishers, stop publication incentives that have perverse impacts and drive us away from junk science.

A new paper has found why: Under pressure from Uzbekistan’s government, academics are succumbing to predatory journals – publishers that, for a fee, overlook best practices like peer review or editing. Many of the researchers are forced to publish far more often than feasible if the bar were higher, and the quality shows: Uzbek academics are global leaders in spreading research that some scholars would explicitly call “bullshit.”

“Publish or perish”: It’s a global problem among academics, with eye-opening salience in Uzbekistan, find Bahtiyor Eshchanov of the Center for Economic Research and Reforms in Tashkent and his three Uzbek co-authors in a new paper in Publications, a peer-reviewed journal about scholarly publishing.

Eshchanov and his colleagues trace the proliferation of this “pseudo-research” and find that the trouble in Uzbekistan is caused by two forces, one local and one global.

Under pressure, Uzbek researchers flood academia with nonsense
Uzbekistan’s government is pushing its academics to publish in for-profit, predatory journals. Dumbing down the discourse does no one favors.

Related Reading

Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (Papers: M Ángeles Oviedo-García | August 2021)

(Pakistan) The rising menace of scholarly black-market Challenges and solutions for improving research in low-and middle-income countries – JPMA Editorial (Aamir Raoof Memon, Farooq Azam Rathore | June 2021

Without stronger ethical standards, predatory publishing will continue to be a permanent feature of scholarly communication – London School of Economics Impact Blog (Panagiotis Tsigaris and Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva | March 2021)

Predatory Publishing in Scopus: Evidence on Cross‑country Differences (Papers: Vít Macháček & Martin Srholec | February 2021)

(South Africa) Publish, profit, predate, perish and peer review – University World News (Patrick Fish | October 2020)

Questionable publishing practice? Are you harmed?

Demarcating Spectrums of Predatory Publishing: Economic and Institutional Sources of Academic Legitimacy (PrePrint Papers: Kyle Siler | June 2018)

(Australia) Thousands of researchers in Australia appear on editorial boards of ‘predatory’ journals – Nature Index (Dalmeet Singh Chawla | April 2020)

(India) India’s Fight Against Predatory Journals: An Interview with Professor Bhushan Patwardhan – Scholarly Kitchen (Tao Tao | February 2020)

Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process (Papers: Samantha Cukier, et al | February 2020)

Pondering on whether to submit your research output to a journal?

Repairing an Institutional Reputation Tarnished by Fraudulent Publishing – Scholarly Kitchen (Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe | September 2019)

Fighting Citation Pollution — The Challenge of Detecting Fraudulent Journals in Works Cited – Scholarly Kitchen ( Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe and Michael Clarke | September 2019)

Why India is striking back against predatory journals – Nature (Bhushan Patwardhan | July 2019)

Mentors help authors say “no” to predatory journals – Elsevier Connect (Marilynn Larkin | November 2018)

Are we missing the true picture? Stop calling a moneybox, a fishing hook

NIH to researchers: Don’t publish in bad journals, please – Retraction Watch (Alison McCook | December 2017)

Continuing Steps to Ensuring Credibility of NIH Research: Selecting Journals with Credible Practices – Extramural Nexus (Mike Lauer | November 2017)

Examining publishing practices: moving beyond the idea of predatory open access (Papers: Kevin L. Smith | November 2017)

Is predatory scientific publishing “becoming an organized industry”? – Physics Today (Steven T. Corneliussen | September 2017)

Who is Actually Harmed by Predatory Publishers? (Papers: Martin Paul Eve and Ernesto Priego | 2017)

In a world of hijacked, clone and zombie publishing, where shouldn’t I publish?

Identifying Predatory Publishers – The Scientist (Tracy Vence | July 2017)

Predatory journals – A threat to academic credibility – University World News (Stephen Coan | May 2017)

Black lists, white lists and the evidence: exploring the features of ‘predatory’ journals – BioMed Central Blog (David Moher & Larissa Shamseer | March 2017)

Predatory Publishing as a Rational Response to Poorly Governed Academic Incentives – Scholarly Kitchen (David Crott | February 2017)

Increased Publication in Predatory Journals by Developing Countries’ Institutions: What it Entails? And What Can be Done? (Papers: Mulubrhan Balehegn | 2017)

The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics (Papers: Stefan Eriksson & Gert Helgesson | 2016)

Blacklists are technically infeasible, practically unreliable and unethical. Period. – LSE Blog (Cameron Neylon | January 2017)

Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals – WAME (Christine Laine & Margaret A. Winker | February 2017)

Selecting a publisher: Essential resources for HDR candidates and early career researchers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in