Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(US) Harvard eye researchers have eight papers retracted for lack of ethical approval – Retraction Watch (Adam Marcus | March 2022)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Human Research Ethics, Research Integrity on April 9, 2022
Keywords: Beneficence, Consent, Ethical review, Human research ethics, International, Protection for participants, Research ethics committees, Research integrity, Research Misconduct

The Linked Original Item was Posted On March 21, 2022

A close-up of a shelf packed with medical records.

A group of eye researchers is up to eight retractions for problems with the ethics approval for their studies.

Prior to the nineties (and we’re being generous here), health researchers might be forgiven for forgetting research ethics review.  Saying nothing about research ethics being an integral part of their research design.  But those days are long past.  Without ethics approval, we can only speculate about matters such as consent for the research (discrete from consent for the clinical procedure) and beneficence considerations.

The studies appeared in three journals, although one, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), is pulling six studies.

The senior author on all eight publications was Jorge G. Arroyo, a former faculty member at Harvard. Arroyo’s LinkedIn page now lists him as being with Boston Vision, a private medical practice.

Here’s the notice for the six retractions in IOVS, which covers abstracts submitted to the annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology between 2019 and 2021:

“Effect of 3-Hour Normobaric Hyperoxia on Diabetic Macular Edema” by Robert Minturn, Brendan Seto, Keiko Yamada, Ke Zeng, and Jorge G. Arroyo (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(9):2635).

“The Effect of Hyperoxia and Hypercapnia on Retinal Vascular Blood Flow in Healthy Adults” by Keiko Yamada, Brendan Seto, Christopher Llerena, Christopher Hsu, Chie Sotozono, Takatoshi Maeno, and Jorge G. Arroyo (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(9):5742).

Harvard eye researchers have eight papers retracted for lack of ethical approval
Jorge Arroyo A group of eye researchers is up to eight retractions for problems with the ethics approval for their studies. The studies appeared in three journals, although one, Investigative Opht…

Related Reading

Friday afternoon’s funny – How would you describe a research ethics committee?

Friday afternoon funny – Regard for welfare and respect for persons

Ethics CoPs not Ethics Police: Building communities of practice in ethics and integrity

Friday afternoon funny – We won’t say that we’ve heard this a lot but…

Misrepresenting “Usual Care” in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error (Papers: Ruth Macklin, Charles Natanson | January 2020)

Breakthrough Gene Therapy Clinical Trial is the World’s First That Aims to Reverse 20 Years of Aging in Humans – CISION (Osvaldo R. Martinez-Clark | November 2019)

Pay-to-Participate Trials and Vulnerabilities in Research Ethics Oversight – JAMA Network (Holly Fernandez Lynch, et al | September 2019)

(US) ER patients given ketamine, other powerful drugs in clinical trials without their consent, FDA finds – STAT (Sharon Begley | October 2018)

(US) Amid Dispute, Award Returned – Inside Higher Ed (Scott Jaschik | July 2017)

The Role of Intuition in Risk/Benefit Decision-Making in Human Subjects Research (Papers: David B. Resnik | June 2016)

Does your work need IRB approval? Better check, says author of retracted paper – Retraction Watch (Shannon Palus: September 2016)

A Tool to Help Address Key Ethical Issues in Research – Journal of Medical Ethics Blog (Rebecca H. Li and Holly Fernandez Lynch 2016)

An Ethical Framework for the development and review of health research proposals involving humanitarian contexts, Enhanced Learning and Research for Humanitarian Action, Project Final Report

The Ethics Police?: The Struggle to Make Human Research Safe (Podcast from Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs, Public Affairs; Books: Robert Klitzman 2015)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in