A journal’s image restrictions aim to boost ties with tribes, but critics fear loss of academic freedom
As editor-elect of the journal Southeastern Archaeology, Rob Beck helped choose a cover photo for the penultimate issue of 2020. It showed about 20 ceramic vessels, some painted with colorful patterns. They had been excavated in the early 1900s from the Crystal River Archaeological State Park in Florida, home to some of the region’s oldest ancient Indigenous earthworks.
Being passionate about your discipline doesn’t mean you can be indifferent to awareness of respectful behaviour in the design, conduct and reporting of research with First People. Having a strong belief in academic freedom doesn’t give you license to cause offence or trash cultural protocols. What might have been acceptable and something that might have added ‘colour’ and authenticity to a research output even 20 years ago, is simply unacceptable and unethical now. This story is from the US and is a demonstration of this point.
But that decision, too, sparked an outcry.
“I felt like I’d been kicked in the gut,” says Vin Steponaitis, an archaeologist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, who says it’s crucial for scholars to freely share and study such images. “There’d been no discussion of it with the membership, and I could instantly see that this policy would have a major impact on shutting down research.” He was one of 30 SEAC members who signed a petition calling for a vote to revoke the image policy.