Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
What was that say
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Turnitin announces AI detector with ‘97 per cent accuracy’ – Times Higher Education (Tom Williams | February 2023)

Posted by Connar Allen in Research Integrity on March 8, 2023
Keywords: Authorship, Journal, Publication ethics, Research Misconduct, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On February 14, 2023

A digital representation of an artificial eye and artificial intelligence.

Edtech giant prepares to offer customers new tool from April as it grapples with challenges posed by ChatGPT

Turnitin will make its artificial intelligence writing detector available “as early as April”, claiming it can identify ChatGPT-authored writing 97 per cent of the time.

The capability of ChatGPT has the potential to disrupt scientific writing, education and research in general.  If the producer’s claims are accurate, this system could be a huge relief for publisher, research institutions and research funding bodies.  There are some who are dubious about the claimed accuracy of the detector.  This Times Higher Education piece discusses claims and the concerns in the education sector about ChatGPT.

The Silicon Valley-based company will offer the tool alongside its ubiquitous plagiarism checker in a move commentators said could heighten calls for more universities to ban students from using AI.

Companies have been scrambling to offer a tool capable of judging if a student has used ChatGPT since its hugely successful launch by the company OpenAI last year. In January, the software became one of the fastest-growing technological tools of all time when it reached 100 million active users after just two months.

Turnitin said its detector “identifies 97 per cent of ChatGPT and GPT3 authored writing, with a very low less than 1/100 false positive rate”.

“Based on how our detection technology is performing in our lab and with a significant number of test samples, we are confident that Turnitin’s AI writing detection capabilities will give educators information to help them decide how to best handle work that may have been influenced by AI writing tools,” said Annie Chechitelli, chief product officer at Turnitin.

Turnitin announces AI writing detector and AI writing resource center for educators
OAKLAND, Calif. - February 13, 2023 - Turnitin has successfully developed an AI writing detector that, in its lab, identifies 97 percent of ChatGPT and GPT3 authored writing, with a very low less than 1/100 false positive rate. The company plans to add this functionality to its core writing integri…

Related Reading

As scientists explore AI-written text, journals hammer out policies – Science (Jeffrey Brainard | February 2023)

Research integrity reform: a light touch with teeth – Campus Morning Mail (Nicholas Fisk | February 2023)

A.I. Like ChatGPT Is Revealing the Insidious Disease at the Heart of Our Scientific Process – Slate (Charles Seife | January 2023)

What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science – Nature (Chris Stokel-Walker & Richard Van Noorden | February 2023)

Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge (Papers: Annette Flanagin et al. | January 2023)

Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature (January 2023)

ChatGPT: our study shows AI can produce academic papers good enough for journals – just as some ban it – The Conversation (Brian Lucy & Michael Dowling | January 2023)

Science journals ban listing of ChatGPT as co-author on papers – The Guardian (Ian Sample | January 2023)

CNET’s AI Journalist Appears to Have Committed Extensive Plagiarism – Futurism (Jon Christian | January 2023)

Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists – Nature (Holly Else | January 2023)

ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature (Chris Stokel-Walker | January 2023)

AI and Scholarly Publishing: A View from Three Experts – The Scholarly Kitchen (Anita De Waard | January 2023)

Scientists, please don’t let your chatbots grow up to be co-authors – Substack (Gary Marcus | January 2023)

Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers (Papers: Catherine A. Gao et. al. | December 2022)

AI et al.: Machines Are About to Change Scientific Publishing Forever – ACS Publications (Gianluca Grimaldi & Bruno Ehrler | January 2023)

AI paper mills and image generation require a co-ordinated response from academic publishers – LSE (Rebecca Lawrence & Sabina Alam | December 2022)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in