Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

The Role of the Media – Healthcare Triage (Ed Young et. al. | March 2022)

Posted by Connar Allen in Research Integrity on April 2, 2023
Keywords: Institutional responsibilities, Publication ethics, Research Misconduct, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On March 2, 2022

closeup of a doctor man, wearing blue surgical gloves, having a digital tablet in his hands with the word infodemic in its screen

Episode Description:

The media loves a good headline about an exciting study. But can the way science media covers studies affect the science itself?

With its ravenous obsession with clicks and eyeballs, the media has a tendency to overhype promising early results. Irresponsible journalists can and do fuel crackpot theories and dangerous treatments. This behaviour can influence the behaviour of researchers, institutions and funding bodies. This interesting item from Healthcare Triage looks at the problem.

The Role of the Media
Episode 5 of our series on the culture of science and reproducibility. The media loves a good headline about an exciting study. But can the way science media covers studies affect the science itself?

Related Reading

Building Trust in Science Communication: The Role of Journals & Journalists, Pre-& Post-Publication – PLOS Media (Ivan Oransky, Fiona Fox & Renee Hoch | September 2022)

(Australia) Retraction inaction: How the pandemic has exposed frailties in scientific publishing – Monash University (Steve Mcdonald | October 2022)

(Australia) Hydroxychloroquine in Australia: a cautionary tale for journalists and scientists – Reuters Institute (Joanna McCarthy | August 2022)

Rise of the preprint: how rapid data sharing during COVID-19 has changed science forever – Nature (Clare Watson | January 2022)

Retractions aren’t a panacea for bad research – The Washington Post (Erin Blakemore | July 2022)

How Science Fuels a Culture of Misinformation – Open Mind (Joelle Renstrom | June 2022)

(Australia) Australia needs an Office for Research Integrity to catch up with the rest of the world – The Conversation (David Vaux | February 2022)

(Australia) Gaslighting the world: Coalition pressured its own scientists to save reef from ‘at risk’ label – Crikey (Kishor Napier-Raman | September 2021)

(Germany) Why did a German newspaper insist the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine was inefficacious for older people—without evidence? – The BMJ (Hristio Boytchev | February 2021)

Science Is Truth Until It Isn’t – 3 Quarks Daily (Thomas O’Dwyer | February 2021)

Science Had a Misinformation Problem Before COVID. Scientists Want to Fix It – Vice (Sarah Wells | May 2021)

Retracting publications doesn’t stop them from influencing science – Massive Science (Fanni Daniella Szakal | March 2021)

(US) Data Corruption: DOJ Targets Fraud In Medical Research Trial In The Era Of COVID-19 – jdSupra (Jessica Heim, et al | March 2021)

(Peru) Scandal over COVID vaccine trial at Peruvian universities prompts outrage – Nature (Luke Taylor | March 2021)

Journalism, Preprint Servers, and the Truth: Allocating Accountability – Scholarly Kitchen (Rick Anderson | December 2020)

Disseminating Scientific Results in the Age of Rapid Communication – EOS (Shobha Kondragunta, et al | October 2020)

(US) The pandemic is rewriting the rules of science. But at what cost? – The Washington Post (Frances Stead Sellers | October 2020)

Coronavirus Tests Science’s Need for Speed Limits – New York Times (Wudan Yan | April 2020)

Science by press release: When the story gets ahead of the science – CNN (Dr. Sanjay Gupta | June 2020)

Assuring research integrity during a pandemic – BMJopinion (Gowri Gopalakrishna, et al | June 2020)

The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories – Nature (Philip Ball & Amy Maxmen | May 2020)

The Lancet has made one of the biggest retractions in modern history. How could this happen? – The Guardian (James Heathers | June 2020)

(COVID-19) Underpromise, overdeliver – Science (Editorial – H. Holden Thorp | March 2020)

The Mess That Is Science Publishing – The James G. Center for Academic Renewal (John Staddon | January 2020)

Science Communications In the Time of Coronavirus – WYNC Studios (March 2020)

The Rise of Junk Science – The Walrus (Alex Gillis | July 2019)

The Rush to Publication: An Editorial and Scientific Mistake – JAMA Editorial (Howard Bauchner | September 2017)

Medical Journals Have a Fake News Problem – Bloomberg News (Esmé E Deprez and Caroline Chen | August 2017)

Clickbait and impact: how academia has been hacked – LSE Impact Blog (Portia Roelofs & Max Gallien | September 2017)

Old Media, New Media, Data Media: Evolving Publishing Paradigms – The Scholarly Kitchen (Joseph Esposito September 2016)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in