Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Scholarly misconduct in science – Ockham’s Razor (July 2016)

Posted by saviorteam in Research Integrity on July 30, 2016
Keywords: Australia, Authorship, Breaches, Case studies, Conflicts of interest, Controversy/Scandal, Fraud, Honesty, Methodology, News, Peer review, Publication ethics, Research integrity, Research Misconduct, Research results, Researcher responsibilities
Piece of glass atop a page from a dictionary magnifying the word integrity and its definition.

(This discussion piece appeared on the ABC’s Ockham’s Razor programme).

Robyn Williams: Fraud. In science it’s rare, and usually found out, but devastatingly destructive. Strangely, it’s often perpetrated by the very clever who couldn’t be bothered doing all that tedious lab work. Ian Freckleton QC is concerned. He’s Professorial Fellow at the University of Melbourne in law and psychiatry, and here he gives three examples of famous cases.

Ian Freckleton: The first is Jan Hendrik Schön, who was a researcher in condensed matter physics and nanotechnology, he received his PhD from the University of Konstanz in 1997, and then was employed by Bell Laboratories, the institution that had done much of the work toward the invention of the first laser, and had been the first to use radio telescopes to detect the echo of the Big Bang. Schön’s research was into the transformation of the properties of materials by the application of an electric field. He built high-performance transistors not from the usual silicon but from the semi-conductor copper gallium selenide (CGS). He described what he maintained was the world’s first organic electrical laser, and the first ever light-emitting transistor. In 2001, he claimed to have built the world’s smallest transistor by wiring up a single molecule and having used a thin layer of organic dye molecules to assemble an electronic circuit when acted on by an electric current. This placed Schön at the forefront of international nanotechnology research. The potential of his work was enormous as it raised the possibility of a movement away from silicon-based electronics to organic electronics, allowing a dramatic reduction in the size of chips.

As of 2001, Schön was publishing a new research paper every eight days. This included a series of studies in both Nature and Science that promised a transformation in nanotechnology. However, clouds began to gather. Professor Lydia Sohn of Princeton University and Professor Paul McEuen of Cornell University expressed concern about anomalies in Schön’s research, including what they suggested was his use of duplicate data. Under pressure, Bell Laboratories appointed a formal committee chaired by Professor Malcolm Beasley of Stanford University to conduct an investigation into the concerns raised. One of its first acts was to request Schön to supply his raw data. He maintained, however, that he could not do so as he had not kept his laboratory notes and that his data files had been deleted from his computer. He also maintained that his experimental samples had been discarded or were not available for examination. The Committee found Schön to have engaged in 16 instances of fraud. It concluded that he had substituted, manipulated and fabricated data sets. Schön admitted though to having made ‘mistakes.’ In 2004 the University of Konstanz revoked his doctoral degree. Schön took his grievances to the courts, at first successfully, but then lost on appeal…

Listen to the 14:35 programme
Read the transcript/download the audio

Link to Ian Freckleton recent book (published 26 July 2016)

Related Reading

No Related Readings Found!

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in