Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Protect researchers from online abuse, universities told – The Higher Education (Jack Grove | November 2022)

Posted by Connar Allen in Research Integrity on November 22, 2022
Keywords: Good practice, Institutional responsibilities, Research integrity

The Linked Original Item was Posted On November 8, 2022

A monstrous troll typing on a laptop.

Twitter trolls and polarised debate on Covid have caused almost one in four academics to scale back public engagement, says Elsevier study

Universities should publish clear guidelines about how they will support researchers who face online abuse, according to a report that reveals how often academics face social media vitriol for publicising their work.

Trolling is having a serious impact on scientific enquiry and the degree to which researchers are prepared to make claims that are contrary to the views of populist governments, politicians and leaders.  It can have a serious impact upon people’s mental health and well being.  This Times Higher Education piece makes an important point, research institutions should step up and be prepared to support any of their researchers who found themselves targeted by trolls.

According to the study by Elsevier, which polled 3,144 researchers globally, almost one-third of respondents (32 per cent) report that they or a close colleague have experienced online abuse – with the proportion rising to 42 per cent in North America and 34 per cent in Europe.

Nearly a quarter of researchers (24 per cent) say the increased risk of bullying or harassment online is one of the main challenges to bringing more public attention to science.

“A hostile online environment will only make it more difficult for researchers to embrace a more public-facing role,” notes the report, Confidence in Research, which explores how the attitudes of scientists, scholars and researchers have changed because of the pandemic.

“While a safe online environment cannot be guaranteed, some researchers we engaged with felt unsupported by institutions in the face of online abuse.”

Protect researchers from online abuse, universities told
Twitter trolls and polarised debate on Covid have caused almost one in four academics to scale back public engagement, says Elsevier study

SUBSCRIPTION REQUIRED

Related Reading

World’s top journals ‘limiting critiques’ – Times Higher Education (Paul Basken | August 2022)

Trolling Is Taking a Toll on Science Journalism – Undark (Lisa Palmer & Silvio Waisbord | May 2022)

Death threats, ghost researchers and sock puppets: Inside the weird, wild world of dodgy academic research – ABC News

(Germany) Why did a German newspaper insist the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine was inefficacious for older people—without evidence? – The BMJ (Hristio Boytchev | February 2021)

(Germany) Study claiming new coronavirus can be transmitted by people without symptoms was flawed – Science (Kai Kupferschmidt | February 2020)

3 Strategies for Accountable, Ethical Online Behavior Research – Medium (J. Nathan Matias | November 2017)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in