Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(New Zealand) Revisiting — Indigenous Knowledge and Research Infrastructure: An Interview with Katharina Ruckstuhl – Scholarly Kitchen (Alice Meadows | October 2022)

Posted by Connar Allen in Research Integrity on October 24, 2022
Keywords: Authorship, Culture, First People, Justice, New Zealand, Respect for persons

The Linked Original Item was Posted On October 10, 2022

Photo of a beautiful New Zealand lake framed by snow-topped mountains

October 12 is recognized as Columbus Day in the Americas and beyond, in honor of Christopher Columbus’s arrival in America; for nearly 90 years, it has been marked here in the US by a federal holiday on the second Monday in October. But, as countries around the world increasingly grapple with the damage done to their native populations by colonialism, there has been a backlash against holidays that honor the colonizers, and a growing movement towards recognizing the rights, challenges, and contributions of Indiegnous people — last year, Joe Biden issued the first-ever presidential proclamation of Indigenous Peoples’ Day in the US. There is so much more that all of us could be doing to better support Indigenous people including, in our own world of scholarly communications, ensuring that our research infrastructure supports and respects Indigenous knowledge and knowledge management. This Indigenous People’s Day is a good opportunity to re-share my interview with Dr. Katharina Ruckstuhl on this topic from earlier in the year — and to encourage us all to recognize the critical, but often overlooked, importance of Indigenous knowledge.

Globally, there is an increasing awareness of the damage caused to Indigenous knowledge by colonisation.  This very interesting interview looks at the issues from a Māori perspective.  This is a useful read for all researchers, regardless of their career stage.  It also should be considered when institutional policies, guidelines and professional development material is formulated.  At the very least there should be a discussion about data sovereignty, intellectual property and the authorship of research outputs that is based upon First People traditional knowledge.

Indigenous knowledge, defined by UNESCO as “the understandings, skills and philosophies developed by societies with long histories of interaction with their natural surroundings”, is increasingly — if belatedly — being recognized as making a significant contribution to the research endeavor. However, it is poorly supported by the current research infrastructure, which was developed to serve the needs of the global North, especially in the sciences. Dr Katharina Ruckstuhl of the University of Otago, New Zealand, gave a powerful account of this in her recent NISO Plus keynote, Research Infrastructure for the Pluriverse, as well as sharing her thoughts on how we can can implement research infrastructure processes that support pluriversal approaches.

Coverage of Indigenous knowledge in The Scholarly Kitchen has been woefully lacking — the only post I could find is “Questioning Our Assumptions in Publishing Innovations: Inspiration from the Story of Indigital” by Lettie Conrad (if there are others, please let me know!). So I’m very grateful to Katharina for agreeing to answer some questions — a mix of basic and less so — to help us all advance our understanding of this important area of knowledge.

Katharina is an Associate Professor and Dean at the University of Otago Business School. She is a tribal leader and has many governance and Board roles in her community. She is a current ORCID Board member and a member of the IEEE P2890 working party on Recommended Practice for Provenance of Indigenous Peoples’ Data.

Revisiting — Indigenous Knowledge and Research Infrastructure: An Interview with Katharina Ruckstuhl
On Indigenous Peoples’ Day we revisit an interview with Dr. Katharina Ruckstuhl, on how we can ensure that our research infrastructure supports and respects Indigenous knowledge and knowledge management.

Related Reading

(New Zealand) New Zealand professors in Māori science row quit Royal Society – Times Higher Education (John Ross | March 2022)

(New Zealand) Royal Society drops action against controversial letter writers – Times Higher Education (John Ross | March 2022)

(New Zealand) Are New Zealand’s universities doing enough to define the limits of academic freedom? – The Conversation (Matheson Russell | November 2021)

(New Zealand) HRC Research Ethics Guidelines (March 2021)

(New Zealand) HRC Research Ethics Guidelines, 2017 (December 2017)

Principles of Māori & Indigenous research ethics (An annotated bibliography by Dr Lily George)

Reframing Indigenous consultation: engagement and risk management

There’s ‘consent’ and then there’s consent: Mobilising Māori and Indigenous research ethics to problematise the western biomedical model (Papers: Kiri West-McGruer | January 2020)

A preliminary geneaology of research ethics review and Māori

Kua hinga te tōtara i Te Waonui-a-Tāne, the tōtara tree has fallen in Tāne’s great forest

Te Mana Raraunga Statement on 2018 New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings: A Call for Action on Māori Census Data

What’s at risk? Who’s responsible? Moving beyond the physical, the immediate, the proximate, and the individual

He Tangata Kei Tua Guidelines for Biobanking with Māori

Te Ara Tika. Guidelines for Māori research ethics: A framework for researchers and ethics committee members (Guidance and Resource Material | 2010)

The Politicisation of Ethics Review in New Zealand (Book: Martin Tolich and Barry Smith 2015)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in