Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

How we deal with authorship and author disputes – Cell Mentor (Alex Lenkei | June 2021)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on June 16, 2021
Keywords: Authorship, Institutional responsibilities, Journal, Research integrity, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On June 4, 2021

The word "AUTHORS" in translucent overlapping letters

Authorship is a critical component of any academic paper and is especially important in the sciences, where it can affect career advancement, grant funding, and professional reputation.  

This piece is a useful discussion about dealing constructively with authorship disputes.  Such disputes happen far too often and can be toxic, but can be handled fairly by having some institutional arrangements in place.

Manuscripts submitted to Cell Press must include an author list, and all authors should agree to the content and order of the list. But agreeing on the order and knowing whether someone should be a listed author or only an acknowledged contributor can be tricky, and disputes do sometimes arise.

What does authorship mean at Cell Press?
Although policies on authorship can vary from editor to editor and across journals, Cell Press encourages the use of the CRediT taxonomy of contributor roles to help define who should be an author. CRediT was developed in 2012 during a collaboration between the Wellcome Trust and Harvard University and describes the most common types of contributions to scholarly work in the biomedical field and in science more broadly. Since then, it has been adopted by a number of well-known publishers, including Wiley, Springer, and of course Elsevier and Cell Press.  

How we deal with authorship and author disputes
Authorship is a critical component of any paper and can affect career advancement, funding, and reputation. But what happens when authors don’t agree?

Related Reading

Imposters and Impersonators in Preprints: How do we trust authors in Open Science? – Scholarly Kitchen (Leslie D. Mcintosh | March 2021)

A simple guide to ethical co-authorship – London School of Economics Impact Blog (Dr Helen Kara | March 2021)

(US) Scholars fume as PhD theses sold as e-books on Amazon – Times Higher Education (Jack Grove | January 2021)

Poll results on co-authorship of papers using publicly available data – Dynamic Ecology (Jeremy Fox | November 2020)

(US) Authorship Policies at U.S. Doctoral Universities: A Review and Recommendations for Future Policies (Papers: Lisa M. Rasmussen, et al | November 2020)

Unconsented acknowledgments as a form of authorship abuse: What can be done about it? (Papers: Mladen Koljatic | August 2020)

The ethics of authorship and preparation of research publications – World Aquaculture Society (Carole R. Engle | April 2020)

CRediT Check – Should we welcome tools to differentiate the contributions made to academic papers? – LSE Blog (Elizabeth Gadd | January 2020)

Honesty in authorship. Who’s on first? – Hindawi (Eva Amsen | January 2020)

‘A long and lonely process:’ Whistleblowers in a misconduct case speak out – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | )

When CVs Are Too Good to Be True – Inside Higher Ed (Colleen Flaherty | October 2019)

Authorship (NHMRC An Australian Code (2018) good practice guide | June 2019)

We Need to Talk About Authorship Abuse – Inside Higher Ed (A. Susan Jurow and Jordan Jurow | September 2019)

Authorship inflation and author gender in pulmonology research (Blake Umberham, et al | October 2018)

Farewell authors, hello contributors – Nature (Alex Holcombe | July 2019)

Supervision and HDR candidate research outputs (Resource material: Griffith University | June 2018) UPDATED 14/02/19

Recognizing Contributions and Giving Credit – EOS Editors’ Vox (Brooks Hanson and Susan Webb | August 2018)

Resolving authorship disputes by mediation and arbitration (Papers: Zen Faulkes | 2018)

What does it mean to “take responsibility for” a paper? – Scientist Sees Squirrel (Stephen Heard | July 2018)

Rules for authorship must be clarified – The Ethics Blog (Pär Segerdahl | April 2018)

(UK) Academics ‘must sign away authorship rights’ to recorded lectures – THE (Jack Grove | March 2018)

How to counter undeserving authorship (Papers: Stefan Eriksson, et al)

Authorship wars: academics outline the rules for recognition – THE (Holly Else | November 2017)

False investigators and coercive citation are widespread in academic research – LSE Blog (Al Wilhite | March 2018)

Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research (Papers: Eric A. Fong and Allen W. Wilhite | 2017)

Authorship and Team Science – JAMA Network (Editorial | Phil Fontanarosa, et al | December 2017)

(COPE) Core practices

Percentage-based Author Contribution Index: a universal measure of author contribution to scientific articles (Papers: Stéphane Boyer, et al | 2017)

All for one or one for all? Authorship and the cross-sectoral valuation of credit in nutrition science (Papers: Bart Penders | 2017)

Researcher discovers paper published by co-author in another journal – Retraction Watch (Victoria Stern | September 2017)

Authorship for sale: Some journals willing to add authors to papers they didn’t write – Retraction Watch (Alison McCook | September 2017)

New guidance from UKRIO: authorship in academic publications

Where Are the Missing Coauthors? Authorship Practices in Participatory Research (Papers: Daniel Sarna-Wojcicki, et al | 2017)

Ghost and Honorary Authorship in Cancer Research – Cancer Therapy Advisor (Jim Daley: September 2016)

Ethical considerations in naming authors of scientific papers (Papers: Sepideh Mohammadi and Tajmohammad Arazi 2015)

When it takes a village to write a paper, what does it mean to be an author? – Retraction Watch commentary (Alison McCook 2016)

Academic Dishonesty: The Question of Authorship (Papers: Gail Caruth 2014)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in