Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(China) In wake of gene-edited baby scandal, China sets new ethics rules for human studies – Science (Dennis Normile | March 2023)

Posted by Connar Allen in Human Research Ethics on March 12, 2023
Keywords: Beneficence, Bioethics, Biomedical, Institutional responsibilities, International, Medical research, Research Misconduct

The Linked Original Item was Posted On March 7, 2023

Molecule of DNA forming inside the test tube equipment.3d rendering,conceptual image.

Revised regulations require greater disclosure by scientists and more protections for study participants

Nearly 5 years after a Chinese scientist sparked worldwide outrage by announcing he had helped create genetically edited babies, China has unveiled new rules aimed at preventing a repeat of such ethically problematic research on humans.

The genetic work conducted by He was truly shocking and stunned the world. The long-term effects on the girls may not be known for decades. Presumably, the girls will be the subject of multiple investigations throughout their whole lives.  Superficially, this move by China with tighten up their health research guidelines so nothing like this can happen again.  However, some have observed that the new guidance does not go far enough.

Many researchers welcome the new regulations, which set requirements for ethics reviews of research involving humans and human materials such as tissue, fertilized eggs, and embryos. The new rules extensively revise regulations adopted in 2016 and aim to close loopholes exposed by biophysicist He Jiankui in 2018 when he claimed his team had made heritable alterations to the DNA of human embryos that were later born as twin girls. He spent 3 years in prison for conducting “illegal medical practices.”

The new measures, which were developed by four government agencies, “are much more comprehensive and systematic” and “strike a good balance” between protecting people who participate in studies and allowing science to move forward, says Linqi Zhang, a virologist at Tsinghua University.

But some researchers worry they don’t go far enough, given China’s surging biomedical innovation. The revision is “very significant, but I don’t think it is sufficient,” says Joy Zhang, a China-born sociologist at the University of Kent who studies China’s research establishment. A notable shortcoming, she says, is that the rules don’t apply to companies, foundations, and other private entities.

Photo of the Chinese genetic scientist, He
In wake of gene-edited baby scandal, China sets new ethics rules for human studies
Revised regulations require greater disclosure by scientists and more protections for study participants

Related Reading

(China) China expands control over genetic data used in scientific research – Nature (Smriti Mallapaty | May 2022)

(China) China focuses on ethics to deter another ‘CRISPR babies’ scandal – Nature (Smriti Mallapaty | April 2022)

(China) How to protect the first ‘CRISPR babies’ prompts ethical debate – Nature (Smriti Mallapaty | February 2022)

Regulation of human epigenetic editing: ensuring international frameworks for governing Human Genome Editing don’t impede vital medical research

(China) Chinese scientist Li Ning gets 12 years in prison for embezzling US$4.3 million of government funds – South China Morning Post (Stephen Chen | January 2020)

(China/Gene) Chinese scientist who produced genetically altered babies sentenced to 3 years in jail – Science (Dennis Normile | December 2019)

China tightens its regulation of some human gene editing, labeling it ‘high-risk’ – Science (Dennis Normile | February 2019)

Chinese government funding may have been used for ‘CRISPR babies’ project, documents suggest – STAT (Jane Qiu | February 2019)

China to tighten rules on gene editing in humans – Nature (David Cyranoski | March 2019)

New call to ban gene-edited babies divides biologists – Science (Jon Cohen | March 2019)

CRISPR bombshell: Chinese researcher claims to have created gene-edited twins – Science (Dennis Normile | November 2018)

(China) Researcher who edited babies’ genome retreats from view as criticism mounts – BMJ (Chang-Qing Gao, et al | February 2019)

Claim of CRISPR’d baby girls stuns genome editing summit – STAT (Sharon Begley | November 2018)

CRISPR-baby scientist fired by university – Nature (David Cyranoski | January 2019)

Scientist Who Used Gene Editing On Human Embryos Likely To Face Criminal Charges In China – KHN (January 2019)

Amid ethics outcry, should journals publish the ‘CRISPR babies’ paper? – STAT (Adam Marcus | December 2018)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in