Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(Australia) Blacklist journals that keep research locked up, says Schmidt – Times Higher Education (John Ross | November 2020)

Posted by Dr Gary Allen in Research Integrity on December 31, 2020
Keywords: Australia, Institutional responsibilities, Journal, Publication ethics, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On November 9, 2020

Man holding a glass screen towards us with words "OPEN ACCESS" and a logo on it

Covid is no reason to ease off on demands for open knowledge, Australian forum hears

Research funding bodies should take a leaf from astronomy’s book and blacklist journals with prohibitive access policies, says Australian National University vice-chancellor Brian Schmidt.

An excellent observation by ANU’s VC, which we absolutely support.  We have included links to 13 related items.

Professor Schmidt told an online forum that funders should impose “very clear” open access requirements, with researchers barred from publishing in any journal that charged for views – even if the journal was the “bee’s knees”.

“I say, don’t publish in that journal – go somewhere else,” he told the Remaking HE conference. “I have very strong views on this. Sometimes you’ve just got to do what’s right, even if it hurts.”

Read the rest of this discussion piece
Subscription

Related Reading

Open-access Plan S to allow publishing in any journal – Nature (Richard Van Noorden | July 2020)

New deals could help scientific societies survive open access – Science (Jeffrey Brainard | September 2019)

Plan S and the Transformation of Scholarly Communication: Are We Missing the Woods? – Scholarly Kitchen (Alison Mudditt | June 2019)

Ambitious open-access Plan S delayed to let research community adapt – Nature (Holly Else | May 2019)

(US) Politics and Open Access – Scholarly Kitchen (Robert Harington | December 2019)

(Includes an update 07/06/2019) A report about Plan S’s potential effects on journals marks a busy week for the open-access movement – Science (Jeffrey Brainard | March 2019)

Open Access, Academic Freedom, and the Spectrum of Coercive Power – Scholarly Kitchen (Rick Anderson | November 2018)

High-profile subscription journals critique Plan S – Nature (Holly Else | February 2019)

Will the world embrace Plan S, the radical proposal to mandate open access to science papers? – Science (Tania Rabesandratana | January 2019)

Funder open access platforms – a welcome innovation? – LSE Impact Blog (Tony Ross-Hellauer, et al | July 2018)

Radical open-access plan could spell end to journal subscriptions – Nature (Holly Else | September 2018)

Europe’s open-access drive escalates as university stand-offs spread – Science (Holly Else | May 2018)

The long march to open science – Horizons (Sven Titz September 2016)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in