Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
What was that say
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

(Australia) Science fiction in university labs? – The Monthly (Jackson Ryan | September 2023)

Posted by Connar Allen in Research Integrity on September 4, 2023
Keywords: Australia, Breaches, Institutional responsibilities, Research Misconduct

The Linked Original Item was Posted On September 1, 2023

Artistically stressed Australian flag

The case of UNSW and an “anti-cancer superdrug” highlights issues with self-regulation in universities about what constitutes research misconduct

I’ve never seen a desktop like the one David Vaux deals with every day. Word docs, PDFs, spreadsheets and file types I can’t even recognise fill practically every inch of his laptop’s screen. As I sit next to him in the red-brick University House at the University of Melbourne, his cursor searches for a file among the clutter. He tells me, half-jokingly, to forget what I’m seeing – almost all of the material concerns investigations into research misconduct in Australian universities. Some are ongoing. Some are confidential.

The details of this case are complex and hotly disputed but illustrate why Australia needs an investigative body that is independent, expert and well-resourced.  The system of institutions investigating themselves and acting on findings isn’t working and isn’t serving Australia well.  The consequences of compromised research are too serious to be allowed to be dictated by concerns about funding and institutional reputation.

The one I’m interested in is not a secret. It’s a case Vaux, one of Australia’s most respected scientific integrity advocates, has been following for more than a decade. In fact, he’s one of the case’s major protagonists – Captain Ahab in search of his White Whale. It’s a case centred around Levon Michael Khachigian, a highly regarded vascular biologist at the University of New South Wales (UNSW). In the past two decades, Professor Khachigian has published more than 250 research articles and brought in more than $30 million of funding to the university in a quest to understand blood vessels and the pathology of cancer.

Vaux double-clicks a document on the desktop. An 80-page timeline expands across the screen. The first date, at the top of the page, is June 1995. It references a seminal paper by American scientists regarding a new type of therapeutic drug, known as DNAzymes. But for Vaux, this story starts 14 years later: August 25, 2009. It remains unfinished.

On that day, after spotting a duplicated image – a potential sign of data manipulation or fabrication – in a scientific paper authored by Khachigian and some of his students, Vaux sent an email to alert the vascular biologist to the issue. Most researchers would be immediately concerned by this kind of correspondence and eager to correct the scientific record. Khachigian’s response, Vaux says, was blasé.

Science fiction in university labs?
The case of UNSW and an “anti-cancer superdrug” highlights issues with self-regulation in universities about what constitutes research misconduct

Related Reading

(Australia) Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre embroiled in ‘sham’ research scandal – Sydney Morning Herald (Liam Mannix | August 2023)

(Australia) Push for science watchdog as inquiry finds ‘disincentive’ for self-regulation – Sydney Morning Herald (Liam Mannix | August 2023)

(Australia) ‘I lose sleep at night’: Experts fight to expose science fraud in Australia – The Sydney Morning Herald (Liam Mannix | June 2023)

(Australia) Latest revelations of harassment at Australia’s Antarctic program raise hopes for change – The Guardian (Henry Belot | April 2023)

(Australia) Protecting research integrity: change or the same old ARIC – Campus Morning Mail (Stephen Matchett | March 2023)

(Australia) Retraction inaction: How the pandemic has exposed frailties in scientific publishing – Monash University (Steve Mcdonald | October 2022)

(Australia) Research integrity in the age of ‘fake news’: A challenge to the humanities – Australian Academy of the Humanities (Emerita Professor Tessa Morris-Suzuki FAHA | July 2022)

(Australia) Research scandal costs Queensland institute millions of dollars – Brisbane Times (Sean Parnell | April 2022)

(Australia) Australia needs an Office for Research Integrity to catch up with the rest of the world – The Conversation (David Vaux | February 2022)

(Australia) Leading Queensland cancer researcher Mark Smyth fabricated scientific data, review finds – ABC News (Janelle Miles | January 2022)

(Australia) How fake science is infiltrating scientific journals – Sydney Morning Herald (Harriet Alexander | January 2022)

(Australia) Suspected fraud cases prompt calls for research integrity watchdog – WA Today (Harriet Alexander | December 2021)

(Australia) Macquarie University considers investigating suspected research fraud – Brisbane Times (Harriet Alexander | December 2021)

(Australia) University investigates claims of research misconduct in studies on ageing – Sydney Morning Herald (Liam Mannix | October 2021)

“Our current approaches are not working:” Time to make misconduct investigation reports public, says integrity expert – Retraction Watch (Ivan Oransky | June 2019)

(Australia Queensland case) ‘Cult’ Universal medicine practices promoted by researchers, UQ launches investigation – ABC News (Josh Robertson | May 2018)

(Australian QLD case) Research problems at Australian university hit the news – Retraction Watch (Victoria Stern | April 2018)

‘Cult’ Universal medicine practices promoted by researchers, UQ launches investigation – ABC News (Josh Robertson | Apr 2017)

(Australian case) Authors withdraw study, citing “accidentally duplicated” images – Retraction Watch (Victoria Stern | September 2017)

Academic misconduct claims: Fresh call for national body – The Australian (Darragh O’Keefe | October 2016)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in