Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
What was that say
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

A research team’s finding of pre-human burial sites was publicly lauded. Then came the peer reviews. – Princetonian (Mahya Fazel-Zarandi & Julian Hartman-Sigall | July 2023)

Posted by Connar Allen in Research Integrity on July 28, 2023
Keywords: Breaches, Peer review, Research Misconduct, Research results

The Linked Original Item was Posted On July 18, 2023

Replica of skull of Peking Man / Homo erectus pekinensis against white background

Editor’s Note: This story was initially published with the title “Team including Princeton anthropologist makes groundbreaking discovery on early human burial practices.” This story has been significantly updated with new information from the peer reviews revealed publicly shortly before initial publication. The original text can be found here.

A couple of embers of our team watched this streamed documentary and were struck by the questions raised by the peer reviewers of this work.  This story highlights the perils of ‘sensational’ and ‘disruptive’ results to the mass media prior to thoughtful and expert peer review.

Eight years after discovering a new species in the human lineage, the Homo naledi, a team of scientists from National Geographic working in collaboration with Princeton anthropology professor Agustín Fuentes announced their findings in a newly-reviewed preprint: Homo naledi buried their dead. Until now, burying the dead and other cognitive-based behaviors such as using symbols have only been linked with larger-brained Homo sapiens and Neanderthals.

The team also announced the discovery of rock engravings, which they believe to be created by Homo naledi, in the Rising Star cave system in South Africa.

But announcement in popular media such as the National Geographic, CNN, the front page of the New York Times, and a new Netflix documentary entitled Unknown: Cave of Bones was of preprints, which are first-drafts of studies prior to peer review. The flashy rollout became a source of controversy when critical peer reviews were published on July 12 — only five days before Unknown: Cave of Bones was released.

A research team’s finding of pre-human burial sites was publicly lauded. Then came the peer reviews.
The flashy rollout became a source of controversy when critical peer reviews were published on July 12 — only five days before Unknown: Cave of Bones was released.

Related Reading

(Australia) ‘Compromised’ survey data leads to article retraction and university investigation – Retraction Watch (Marcus Banks | May 2023)

(US) Column: Anti-vaxxers loved to cite this study of COVID vaccine deaths. Now it’s been retracted – Los Angeles Times (Michael Hiltzik | April 2023)

The need for ethical guidance for research other than human research or animal-based scientific work

Pressure to publish is ‘fuelling illegal practices in palaeontology’ – Nature (Clare Watson | November 2022)

How a scandal in spider biology upended researchers’ lives – Nature (Max Kozlov | August 2022)

(Australia) Research integrity in the age of ‘fake news’: A challenge to the humanities – Australian Academy of the Humanities (Emerita Professor Tessa Morris-Suzuki FAHA | July 2022)

Paleontology ‘a hotbed of unethical practices rooted in colonialism’, say scientists – The Guardian (Linda Geddes | March 2022)

(Australia) Macquarie University considers investigating suspected research fraud – Brisbane Times (Harriet Alexander | December 2021)

(New Zealand) Are New Zealand’s universities doing enough to define the limits of academic freedom? – The Conversation (Matheson Russell | November 2021)

Provenance matters (Editorial Paper | August 2021)

Science Is Truth Until It Isn’t – 3 Quarks Daily (Thomas O’Dwyer | February 2021)

(Australia and Canada) ‘How I got fooled’: The story behind the retraction of a study of gamers – Retraction Watch (Leto Sapunar | June 2020)

‘Avalanche’ of spider-paper retractions shakes behavioural-ecology community – Nature (Giuliana Viglione | February 2020)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Links

Complaints against Research Ethics Monthly

Request a Takedown

Submission Guidelines

About the Research Ethics Monthly

About subscribing to the Research Ethics Monthly

A diverse group discussing a topic

Random selected image from the AHRECS library. These were all purchased from iStockPhoto. These are images we use in our workshops and Dr Allen used in the GUREM.

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in