Opinion: Exorcising Ghostwriting from Peer Review – TheScientist (James L. Sherley | January 2020)
Training young scientists to review submitted manuscripts should be an academic exercise, not a facet of professional scientific publishing. On
Training young scientists to review submitted manuscripts should be an academic exercise, not a facet of professional scientific publishing. On
International codes of conduct are important, but grass-roots efforts are the key to embedding research integrity. When it comes to
The earliest codes of ethics in Estonia were formulated during the first period of independence (1918-1940). For instance, the first
About the document Research integrity is inherently linked to the quality and excellence of research and science for policy. To
UGC has made a two-credit course compulsory at the PhD level looking at the increasing cases of plagiarism and publication
“It is a quiet day at Lycoming… when suddenly the campus is taken over by Plagiarism goblins who want to
Abstract Both scientists and society at large have rightfully become increasingly concerned about research integrity in recent decades. In response,