The popularity and use of Bayesian methods have increased across many research domains. The current article demonstrates how some less
Abstract Review, promotion, and tenure (RPT) processes at universities typically assess candidates along three dimensions: research, teaching, and service. In
Abstract Organisations in Europe differ significantly in how they promote research integrity (RI). Higher education institutions play a pivotal role
We live in a time where there is an obsession with perfection. The best research is where a team has persevered with a big claim that will change the world, collected flawless data which points to unequivocal results. Right? Not really no. We need to train the next generation of researchers to understand that science is messy and incremental. Null results that find a theory was false are just as important as the successes. The success bias of published trials and journals needs to change.
There are key warning and other factors individuals should look out for before accepting a job in a laboratory, clinic or other workplaces. They may not be quite as funny as those depicted in this Don Mayne cartoon. Nevertheless, the attractiveness of the job is not purely a matter of salary amount, location, director or career trajectory. A job may be great in that regard, but still be a toxic workplace that could have emotional as well as career costs. We have included links to two related items.
Abstract Background: One way to strengthen research integrity, is through supervision. According to previous research, a supervisor should be well
A topic often not discussed when questionable publishers are spoken about is the degree to which potentially valuable work is lost to science and society when it appears in a dubious publication.
A fascinating reflection on privilege, prejudice and exclusion, with implications for higher education and research programs well beyond India.
