We’re Incentivizing Bad Science – Scientific American (James Zimring | October 2019)
Current research trends resemble the early 21st century’s financial bubble Whatever you might want to say about humans, our behavior
Current research trends resemble the early 21st century’s financial bubble Whatever you might want to say about humans, our behavior
Recent allegations of copyright violations against a professor who shared his own work on his website spark debate about ownership
In her second career as a bioethicist, a former general practitioner is reshaping the scientific literature of organ transplantation. From
Earlier this year, a U.S. District Court ruled that publisher and conference organizer Srinubabu Gedela and his companies OMICS, iMedPub,
Kelly Cobey studies the shadowy world of scammers who publish fraudulent medical journals, but a few years back her professional
Retraction Watch readers who have been following our coverage of retractions by Ali Nazari may have noticed that an anonymous
Not all retractions are created equal. Science is an activity performed by humans, so it’s inevitable that some of the
Science publishers aren’t supposed to be in the disinformation business. And that’s precisely what a federal judge in Nevada was