Skip to content

ACN - 101321555 | ABN - 39101321555

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

AHRECS icon
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Consultants
    • Services
  • Previous Projects
  • Blog
  • Resources
  • Feeds
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Request a Quote
    • Susbcribe to REM
    • Subscribe to VIP
Exclude terms...
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
AHRECS
Analysis
Animal ethics
Animal Ethics Committee
Animal handling
Animal housing
Animal Research Ethics
Animal Welfare
ANZCCART
Artificial Intelligence
Arts
Australia
Authorship
Belief
Beneficence
Big data
Big data
Biobank
Bioethics
Biomedical
Biospecimens
Breaches
Cartoon/Funny
Case studies
Clinical trial
Collaborative research
Conflicts of interest
Consent
Controversy/Scandal
Controversy/Scandal
Creative
Culture
Data management
Database
Dual-use
Essential Reading
Ethical review
Ethnography
Euthanasia
Evaluative practice/quality assurance
Even though i
First People
Fraud
Gender
Genetics
Get off Gary Play man of the dog
Good practice
Guidance
Honesty
HREC
Human research ethics
Humanities
Institutional responsibilities
International
Journal
Justice
Links
Media
Medical research
Merit and integrity
Methodology
Monitoring
New Zealand
News
Online research
Peer review
Performance
Primary materials
Principles
Privacy
Protection for participants
Psychology
Publication ethics
Questionable Publishers
Research ethics committees
Research integrity
Research Misconduct
Research results
Researcher responsibilities
Resources
Respect for persons
Sample paperwork
sd
se
Serious Adverse Event
Social Science
SoTL
Standards
Supervision
Training
Vulnerability
x
Young people
Exclude news

Sort by

Animal Ethics Biosafety Human Research Ethics Research Integrity

Protection for participants

  • Home
  • >
  • Feeds
  • >
  • Protection for participants
A greyscale image of prison bars.

(USA) The Philadelphia Experiments – Quillette (Allen M. Hornblum | December 2022)

In the past, we have played a direct role in the design and delivery of HREC member professional development for the NHMRC.  We are now not proud of that involvement because it embedded poor practice into the conduct of research ethics review in Australia.  Cases like this are shocking and such research practice needs to be blocked from ever happening again.  But the use of an egregious case of medical research from US is unlikely to be considered relevant outside of the health sciences in Australia.  Rather than using such cases for shock value or as justification for research ethics review and combative review decisions, it should be used as an opportunity to discuss, vulnerability, conflicts of interest, researcher responsibilities and clinical trial monitoring.  That approach might seem to be a less shocking or engaging way to go, but it should result in better review decisions.

Read More
Potential vaccination for COVID-19 concept. Beautiful banner - hands of Researcher holding Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Vaccine vials on blue hygienic tone background. Hope, Success, COVAX, Collaboration.

The Pandemic Uncovered Ways to Speed Up Science – WIRED (Saloni Dattani | October 2022)

The accepted wisdom is that careful research to develop new treatments take many years, if not decades.  It is the reason why there has been such a delay between the commencement of clinical trials and the availability of the treatment.  That is why some worried that the availability of Covid treatments was an indication the research been rushed and so the vaccines where are unsafe. The reasoning being, fast research couldn’t be quality research.  However, the response to the pandemic has shown it’s possible to do quality research research quickly.

Read More
A sepia silhouette cartoon of a man stricken holding his hands in a prison cell.

(US) Clinical trial coordinators sentenced to prison after data falsification scheme – Endpoints News (Paul Schloesser | October 2022)

Falsifying clinical trial data and results is not a victimless crime.  At one level, it is potentially fraud of a funding body or institution.  On another, it can place future patients and the wider community at risk, because of a faulty understanding of a condition or the effectiveness/safety of an experimental intervention.  It seems this US court agrees.  An additional factor when someone considers falsification is that, if you believe in the promise of an intervention, if you cheat, you might sully the reputation of the intervention far into the future.

Read More
A funny cartoon of a researcher recruiting Santa to take part in an obesity research project.

Friday afternoon’s funny – Santa visiting a health researcher’s house

Unless a researcher is careful, they can cause harm before a person consents to participate in a project.  As pictured in this Don Mayne cartoon, body-shape shaming Santa would be an example of this.  This consideration is why Chapter 3.1 of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research prompts researchers and research ethics reviewers to consider whether a project’s recruitment strategy could be a source of risk.  Undermining the self-worth of potential participants is a formal of risk.  Shaming Santa is also probably a good way to get yourself on the naughty list.  Whatever your religious, spiritual or scientific beliefs, the AHRECS team wishes you a safe and happy holiday season.  We will continue working over the holiday period.  Insert your own reference to Ebenezer Scrooge here.

Read More
Five hands and arms clasped together.

Is it ethical to be friends with research participants? – LSE (Helen Kara | September 2022)

This very useful London School of Economics Blog story reflects on an important ethical issue for humanities research and research that is participant led designs.  This reflection on the relationship between participant and researcher is very different from the typical design of clinical trials and a great proportion of medical research.  This is a useful read for researchers (especially early in their career) and research ethics reviewers (especially if they are unfamiliar with the review of such research).  

Read More
A funny cartoon about a command centre at a pharmaceutical company monitoring how quickly ethics committees approve their trial, and then telling committees if they have not made a decision fast enough.

Friday afternoon’s funny – Approving multi-site trials should never be a race

When it comes to the research ethics review of multi-site clinical trials, sometimes it can feel like a race to issue an approval in time for your institution to be included as a site for the trial. This can be especially acute for small institutions where being a trial site can be particularly valuable. Committees and institutions should always resist that urge. Good and careful review takes time and is not a sprint to get it done as quickly as possible. Often a speedy review is not a thorough and careful one. 

Read More
Core values and ethics. Successful research and career background.

Practical and Ethical Dilemmas in Researching Sensitive Topics with Populations Considered Vulnerable (Books : Ana Patrícia Hilário & Fábio Rafael Augusto | November 2020)

Preface to “Practical and Ethical Dilemmas in Researching Sensitive Topics with Populations Considered Vulnerable” Conducting social science research is a

Read More
A panoramic view on the Masai Mara during a beautiful sunset

(Africa) Global Health Research in an Unequal World: Ethics Case Studies from Africa (Books: Gemma Aellah, et al | June 2016)

CASE STUDIES How can we best categorize the relationship between researcher and participant? One is paid; the other is not,

Read More
Previous Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 … Page91 Next

Related Links

  • About the contributors
  • About the keywords
  • Suggest a resource
  • Report problem/broken link
  • Request a Take Down

Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…

Resources Menu

Four hands solving a jigsaw against the sun blazing out of a cloudy sky

Research Integrity

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books
  • Animal Ethics

Human Research Ethics

  • Codes, guidelines, policies and standards
  • Guidance and resource material
  • Papers
  • Books

Research Ethics Monthly Receive copies of the Research Ethics Monthly directly
by email. We will never spam you.

  • Enter the answer as a word
  • Hidden
    This field is hidden and only used for import to Mailchimp
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Company
  • Terms Of Use
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map
  • Site Map

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin-in