Peer Review Week – the Podcast and the Videos! – Scholarly Kitchen (Alice Meadows | September 2019)
We’re delighted to end this year’s Peer Review Week celebrations by sharing some great community resources that you can use
We’re delighted to end this year’s Peer Review Week celebrations by sharing some great community resources that you can use
In my experience, the streamlined process of peer review is complicated when reviewers with good intentions do bad things. A
Abstract Background: We believe there is a large number of checklists to help authors detect predatory journals. It is uncertain
New publishing standards aim for clarity on plagiarism, fabrication, and authorship Amid increasing attention to scientific research integrity in China,
Reviewing and accepting study plans before results are known can counter perverse incentives. Chris Chambers sets out three ways to
The publisher is scrutinizing researchers who might be inappropriately using the review process to promote their own work. The Dutch
It’s too easy for bad actors to exploit the process and mislead the public In July, India’s government dismissed a
Keep it constructive. Learning to accept criticism is an important skill for researchers navigating the peer-review process. But what happens