Why were scientists silent over gene-edited babies? – Nature (Natalie Kofler | February 2019)
To be successful as researchers, we must be able to think through the impacts of our work on society and
To be successful as researchers, we must be able to think through the impacts of our work on society and
As concerns surge after a bombshell revelation, here are four questions about this fast-moving field. In the three months since
Some journals, including Biostatistics and BMJ Open Science, add prominent badges to research papers for which the authors have shared
Macquarie University researchers say hundreds of journal papers in the transplant field don’t follow ethical guidelines in declaring whether or
Study finds failure of English language medical journals to comply with international ethical standards A world-first study has called for
Failure to disclose conflicts of interest was “unacceptable” Twelve weeks after publishing a perspective on the ethics of gene editing
Data from clinical trials have long been locked away, some in this principal investigator’s computer bank, some in that pharmaceutical
Scientist He Jiankui’s claimed use of the genetic tool CRISPR to edit the genomes of twin girls led to international