ACN - 101321555 Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)
Generic filters
Exact text matches only
Search into
Filter by Categories
Research integrity
Filter by Categories
Human Research Ethics

Resource Library

Research Ethics MonthlyAbout Us

ResourcesMedical research

Australasian Human Research Ethics Consultancy Services Pty Ltd (AHRECS)

Involving children and young people in research [electronic resource]: A compendium of papers and reflections from a think tank co-hosted by the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth and the NSW Commission for Children and Young People0

Posted by Admin in on September 19, 2015

“Involving children in participatory research raises a number of ethical and access challenges, which highlight the need to better understand the nature and impacts of participatory research in relation to children. This compendium of papers delivered at the Involving Children and Young People in Research Think Tank seeks to do just that.

“The Think Tank, co-hosted by the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth (ARACY) and the New South Wales (NSW) Commission for Children and Young People was held on 11 November 2008. It was organised to bring together researchers and policy makers from many disciplines and sectors to discuss the nature of the experience of participatory research with children and young people. The dual focus of the day was to discuss considerations and issues – both positive and negative – that have featured in this research, and to identify ways of moving forward with these issues in the future.

“This compendium is supported by a literature review (Appendix 2) which examines the ethical and methodological contexts in which research conversations have begun around the world in relation to children’s capacities to act as protagonists in their own lives.”

Link to the compilation

Drug trial a test of ethics – The Australian (Paul Cleary 2015)0

Posted by Admin in on September 12, 2015

When the Australian Defence Force sent troops to Bougainville and East Timor 15 years ago, medical officers saw an opportunity to test new anti-malarial drugs.

Across three years, about 2500 soldiers were used in trials of drugs that were unapproved or had serious side effects on mental health. Some soldiers say they were used as guinea pigs.

Instead of prescribing the safe and tested doxycycline, medical officers prescribed 1319 troops deployed to Timor with mefloquine (branded by Roche as Lariam) even though research published in medical journals from the late 1980s on have linked it to dangerous side effects, including depression and psychotic behaviour. The consent forms said side effects mainly had been found in children weighing less than 45kg and the drug was safer than doxycycline.”

Read this news item.

Mapping Africa Research Ethics Capacity (MARC)0

Posted by Admin in on August 18, 2015

“The MARC project is developing an interactive map of health research ethics review capacity and drug regulatory capacity in Africa. MARC receives financial support from EDCTP and Pfizer to achieve this aim. This ongoing project invites self-uploading of information on African Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and Drug Regulatory Authorities. This information is then integrated into an existing country-based research system mapping structure to facilitate efficiency, sustainability and linkage of ethics ‘maps’ to health research system capacity. This integration allows for ethics capacity analysis in relation to general research system development, encourages comparisons between countries inside and outside Africa, and facilitates sustainability and knowledge sharing throughout the project.”

Is it ethical to use data from Nazi medical experiments? – The Conversation (Lynn Gillam, 2015)0

Posted by Admin in on June 11, 2015

During World War II, Nazi doctors had unfettered access to human beings they could use in medical experiments in any way they chose. In one way, these experiments were just another form of mass torture and murder so our moral judgement of them is clear.

But they also pose an uncomfortable moral challenge: what if some of the medical experiments yielded scientifically sound data that could be put to good use? Would it be justifiable to use that knowledge?