Vulnerability in human research (Papers: Ian J. Pieper & Colin J. H. Thomson AM | April 2020)
Abstract The conduct of prior ethics review of human research projects helps to protect vulnerable groups or populations from potential
HREC
Flying Blind – the Australian Health Data Series: The Ethics Quagmire: Case Studies (Uma Srinivasan | August 2017)
Flying Blind is a series of three reports dedicated to uncovering the acute levels of data fragmentation existing at all
Political Research and Human Research Ethics Committees (Papers: Anthony J. Langlois | 2011)
Human Research Ethics Committees have become an established part of the institutional structure of research in the humanities and social
Constructive Voices: Panel discussion about institutional implementation of the National Statement (2007 updated 2018)
On 22nd of november, AHRECS hosted its second Constructive Voices panel. These panels aim to create an opportunity for open
Contextualising Merit and Integrity within Human Research (Papers: Ian Pieper and Colin Thomson | 2014)
Abstract The first consideration of any Australian Human Research Ethics Committee should be to satisfy itself that the project before
Justice in Human Research Ethics (Papers: Ian Pieper and Colin Thomson | 2014)
Abstract One of the core values to be applied by a body reviewing the ethics of human research is justice.
Message from Professor Colin Thomson AM
Dear Colleague, I hope this finds you well and my apologies for this unsolicited email. Hopefully you already know about
National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007) – Updated with new link to July 2018 update
The National Statement is the Australian national reference for human research. It was issued by the NHMRC and has been
Related Links
Compiled here are links, downloads and other resources relating to research integrity and human research ethics. more…
Resources Menu
