Abstract In this article, we discuss the continued circulation and use of retracted science as a complex problem: Multiple stakeholders
Introduction The Concordat to Support Research Integrity (“Concordat”) provides a national framework for good research conduct and its governance. Research
There can be little doubt that PLOS One has been a powerhouse in academic publishing but it also can seem beset with publication ethics and research misconduct problems. This deep dive into what’s going on behind the scenes at the publisher is interesting and well worth a read. We have included links to quite a few related items.
Abstract Background Several studies reveal a problematic prevalence of research misbehaviors. There are several potential causes of research misconduct but
Abstract What research practices should be considered acceptable? Historically, scientists have set the standards for what constitutes acceptable research practices.
This thought-provoking Scholarly Kitchen piece dips into the controversial question: “Is. it the job of the peer review process to catch research cheats and frauds?” Really another unpaid role, that remains woefully unrecognised by research institutions, funding bodies and academic publishers.
In this video, we chat with Dr Daniel Barr and Dr David Blades from the RMIT University research integrity network,
Abstract When people hear the term “academic misconduct”, student cheating often comes to mind. In this chapter we provide a
