(Australia) Factsheet: Research Governance (Resource: The Institute of Internal Auditors Australia | October 2020)
Why this fact sheet? This fact sheet is designed to show in a straightforward way why research activities need specific
Why this fact sheet? This fact sheet is designed to show in a straightforward way why research activities need specific
This Don Mayne cartoon raises so many serious human research ethics matters in a lighthearted way. Many national Human Research Ethics arrangements/codes/statements prohibit the sale/purchase of human biospecimens. And with good reason. The last thing that we want to see is the desperate, naive or foolish individuals selling critical parts of their body to secure or win money.
Leveraging firsthand experience, BRAIN-funded investigators conducting intracranial human neuroscience research propose two fundamental ethical commitments: (1) maintaining the integrity of
Discussions about the research ethics review of research projects involving work with human biospecimens is a topic we are frequently asked to cover in our research ethics committee professional development. AHRECS is now also working in the animal ethics sphere. Contact us at enquiry@ahrecs.com to discuss engaging us.
Abstract In this article, we show and discuss the results of a quantitative and qualitative analysis of citations to retracted
Stories like this highlight the degree to which editors must be aware of ethical controversies and be aware of the consequences of accepting papers where consent may not have been obtained. You may not see mass resignations like this but it won’t reflect well on your publication.
A lauded tobacco scientist’s crusade against vaping has some critics — and former allies — questioning his research. NOT MANY
The rare retractions come after several scientists raised questions about how Chinese researchers obtained the full consent of their Uyghur